[NU Sports] rebounding disaster

[Beamsley, Jeff]

Couple of thoughts.

These teams are pretty evenly matched.  The loss at home was close.  Hummel had to make a great shot to win and did.  NU learned from that loss.  Carmody switched to a small lineup and won three games including a big win over Illinois.   

NU has to shoot the three well for this small lineup to work.  We didn't do that in the first half (4-11).  Purdude did a good job defending the three, but when we had open looks,  we didn't make 'em.  We also had a tough time finishing around the basket on the sorts of drives that should open up if the D is all out at the three point line.

The good news is that our defense in the first half was just as good as Purdew's, so Purdew shot just as badly as we did.  Other than rebounds, the first half stats were pretty even.

Both teams shot better in the second half but again were pretty close.  NU rebounded much better.  

Where this game was won, however, was at the free throw line.  Even though it seemed like they buried us in threes, we actually outplayed them on the floor.  They were 21-28 at the line in the second half to our 7-12.  The final margin of victory was 10.  

Bottom line is that Purdid was able to make us play their game (gritty physical grind it out) and last night, they were better at it.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of Tom Maycock
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 12:11 PM
To: nwu-sports at tssi.com
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] rebounding disaster

> I realize the Princeton offense means rebounding can be a weakness

It may limit offensive rebounds, but I don't think it has anything inherently to do with defensive rebounding. And that was the big problem yesterday (and has been in many games). 

The 1-3-1 defense certainly doesn't lend itself to strong rebounding. It's just one of the compromises you accept when you play that defense--you're going to give up a few gimmes, and you hope that the turnovers and general mayhem you cause with the 1-3-1 more than offset that. The Cats did play man D for a while in the second half, which I think helped, but then as I recall they had issues staying on 3-point shooters. 


Also, the small lineup isn't conducive to strong rebounding either. (Well, at least theoretically--I think the Cats have actually rebounded better overall with their small lineup than with their "big" lineup). But strong rebounding from a small lineup requires extra-big doses of "want". 

To be fair, especially in the first half Purdue was really putting up some awful shots that lead to really long rebounds, so there was just some bad luck there. However, rebounding is mostly about thinking ahead, being physical, and working your ass off. The Cats flat out didn't do a great job at those things for large portions of the game. 

Too bad, as it was another winnable game, in which the Cats played fairly well, but not great. As the announcers noted, the Cats failed to take advantage of Purdue's cold streak early, which left them no cushion when the Boilers got hot down the stretch. 


Mostly, it just makes the loss at home against Purdue all the more painful. The Cats *could* have won on Sunday, but they *should* have won that game at home. The 0-2 mark against Purdue may haunt them at selection time. Maybe they'll get a rematch in the Big Ten tourney?

Tom

_______________________________________________
nwu-sports site list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports