[NU Sports] hank must go?

DPENDERG at aol.com DPENDERG at aol.com
Sun Sep 18 16:12:58 CDT 2011


No one is calling for anybody's firing just accountability for an  
embarrassing loss and poor effort that should not have been.  And  it's mainly on 
Fitz's shoulders, in my judgment, because it was such  a lethargic, haphazard 
collective breakdown.  
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/18/2011 2:47:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
jintsjason at me.com writes:

Here we  go…lose a game to the best rushing attack in the country, have two 
BACKUP QB's  not able to finish off a game, and a COUPLE questionable 
offensive calls and  the conclusion must be:

a) Fire our DC
b) Fire Fitz
c) We're not  going to win another game all season

Oy vay. It's like you're all  channeling us Red Sox fans.

On second thought...

Jason  Singer
jintsjason at me.com
jason at jasonsinger.com




On Sep  18, 2011, at 11:39 AM, DPENDERG at aol.com wrote:

> All of this finger  pointing at coordinators forces me to emphasize that 
the 
> buck stops  with the head coach when it comes to this embarrassing loss 
at 
>  West  Point yesterday.  The Cats were poorly prepared, lethargic and  
> executed  haphazardly.  I put all of it on the shoulders of  Fitz, who 
failed to  
> get his coaches and players ready for a  very winnable game. I hope  this 
game 
> will be a wakeup call for  the coaches and players.  Playing like  they 
did 
> yesterday  and the Cats will have trouble winning most of their Big Ten  
games  
> this season.  
> 
> 
> In a message dated  9/18/2011 12:03:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
>  sjtruog at yahoo.com writes:
> 
> I agree  with Jim and Mike  ...
> 
> On the question of firing Hank, the answer is a   solid NO. He has done 
much 
> more positive overall than any DC we've  had since  Vandy. And while that 
> last drive wasn't his finest  hour, Army is one of those  offenses that 
is 
> tough to prepare  for and we held them to 21 points. I think  our kids 
could have 
>  been a little better prepared and more adjustments ... but  I really  
think 
> after some early dings and bruises, we were extra-conscious  of  those 
> legal-but-still-cheap low blocks at the knees on the  edges (kind of like 
 the Air 
> Force gams) and it got in our  head.
> 
> I have more ire at McCall  -- 14 points on Army's  D??? We need to find 
out 
> how to sustain a drive - our  play  calling was all over the map. There 
was 
> one possession in the 3rd  where  we took three straight deep shots down 
the 
> field. Go  ahead and take 1 to  stretch the D, but when you're chucking 
it 20+  
> yards three straight plays with  a QB who, despite many  strengths, 
doesn't 
> throw the greatest deep ball ...  well, then  you're just handing it back 
to 
> Army's O and giving our D no  rest.  The O looked fine until they put a 
spy 
> on Kain - then,  once again, we didn't  make any adjustment except 
chucking it 
>  deep more and hoping Jeremy Ebert makes  another amazing catch. And 
Jim's  
> right about before the half as well -  clock management by the  O!
> 
> So like I said, I'm pointing fingers at the  coaches  here -- poor 
> preparation and lack of adjustments. But I  certainly  don't want Hank 
gone and more 
> of that ire is at  McCall for only 14  points.
> 
> As for going all doom and  gloom, I think we're overreacting a  bit 
there. 
> This is NOT the  Miami loss of 1995 (though I wouldn't mind if it  worked 
out 
>  like that one afterwards) ... it's not as bad as losses between  against 
 
> Syracuse, Duke, New Hampshire or others.
> 
> We started  the year  2-1. Like I said, I hoped those days were over, but 
>  considering our best  player is out and 2 of the 3 were on the road, 2-1 
 isn't 
> sky-is-falling bad.  Disappointing? Yes. But not  clean-house bad. As 
we've 
> been over many times -  NU is not the  type of team that can come out and 
win 
> the creampuffs on name   alone -- we can beat just about anyone when 
we're 
> on and lose to just  about  anyone when we're off. Yesterday was 
uninspired by 
> the  players and featured  poor planning/adjustments from the coaches -- 
add  
> that to an Army team that  will play hard on every snap and  wanted it 
more 
> at home and you get the recipe  for a September  loss.
> 
> We've got a week off to get Persa healthy and get   ready for Illinois, 
who 
> will probably be 4-0 and in the top 25. If  they can't  use two weeks to 
> prepare better, get the team  motivated for a rival who  smacked them 
around last 
> year AND  come up with better in-game adjustments,  THEN we can talk 
about a  
> coach's future.
> 
> This one stings, but let's not   overreact either.
> 
> GO CATS!!!
> -SjT
> 
>  
> * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> STEPHEN J.  TRUOG
> sjtruog at yahoo.com
> GO  CATS!!! GEAUX  SAINTS!!!
> Super Bowl XLIV  Champions!
>  ________________________________
> 
> 
> 
>  ________________________________
> From:  Jim Leonard  <jleonard518 at yahoo.com>
> To: Northwestern Wildcats   <nwu-sports at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011  7:58  AM
> Subject: Re: [NU Sports] hank must go?
> 
>  I agree with Mike. Our  spread offense should be productive enough to 
win  
> any game where the defense  holds an opponent to 21 points. I  was 
frustrated 
> that we didn't have a better  attack on defense  but that did not cost us 
the 
> game.
> 
> Who decided  after  BC and EIU that Kain should throw 20+ yards downfield 
>  6-7? 
> Where was  Mike Trumpy in the first quarter? 
>  
> I realize that I am saying this  as a fan and not a coach but I  thought 
we 
> should have tried one quick shot to  the end zone  before the half (when 
we 
> attempted a field goal). I'm pretty  sure  we could have gotten a play 
off in 
> 4 seconds and still had  1-2 ticks on the  clock for the field goal if 
the 
> pass was   incomplete. 
> 
> Jim 
> 
> 
>  ________________________________
> From:  Mike Nolan  <nolan at tssi.com>
> To: bwdolphin146 at yahoo.com
> Cc:   "nwu-sports at tssi.com" <nwu-sports at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sunday,  September  18, 2011 2:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [NU Sports] hank must  go?
> 
>> We  ready for that yet? Hank Cheese? Thoughts?  (I lean towards  yes)
> 
> Thankfully, fans don't make that  kind of decision.   
> 
> Army was #2 in rushing offense  for a reason.  
> 
> I was less  impressed with the  offensive game plan than the
> defensive one.  We  will need  to be able to score more than 14
> points in a game if we want to   make it to a bowl game.
> 
> Let's hope that Persa is ready for  Illinois in  two weeks, their 
> rushing game may not be easy to  stop, either.   
> --
> Mike  Nolan
>  
> _______________________________________________
>  nwu-sports  site  list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
>  http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>  _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports   site  list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
>  http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>  _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports   site  list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
>  http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>  _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site  list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
>  http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports

_______________________________________________
nwu-sports  site  list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports


More information about the nwu-sports mailing list