[NU Sports] McQueary remains on staff

Evans Schoeman eschoeman at sbcglobal.net
Thu Nov 10 22:52:01 CST 2011 

It's certainly understandable, but I find it incredibly ironic that almost no 
one is talking about the perpretator of this tragedy.

I'm no lawyer, but could any of the attorneys out there comment on why Sandusky 
is out on a seemingly-insignificant $100,000 bail?  If ever there's a danger to 
the community, it would seem to be him.


 



________________________________
From: "hakirsch at aol.com" <hakirsch at aol.com>
To: neonrye at aol.com; Michael Vance <michael.vance at att.net>; 
nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com; Northwestern Wildcats <nwu-sports at tssi.com>
Sent: Thu, November 10, 2011 5:55:38 PM
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] McQueary remains on staff

Paul

Point is well taken if I was witness to further acts.  

Harry
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: neonrye at aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:49:34 
To: <hakirsch at aol.com>; Michael Vance<michael.vance at att.net>; 
<nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com>; Northwestern Wildcats<nwu-sports at tssi.com>
Reply-To: neonrye at aol.com
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] McQueary remains on staff

Harry,

I agree with your initial premise, but would you still "feel good" at ages 24, 
25, 26, etc., when Sandusky kept coming around with young boys??!!

Paul
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: hakirsch at aol.com
Sender: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:21:55 
To: Michael Vance<michael.vance at att.net>; <nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com>; 
Northwestern Wildcats<nwu-sports at tssi.com>
Reply-To: hakirsch at aol.com
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] McQueary remains on staff

I inclined to have some of SJT's views here as well as Dennis'. It easy to say 
we would do the right thing but for a low man at  his age 22-25 ? at the time he 
probably figured he did his responsibility and didn't want to risk anything 
going forward 


I would hope had I been his age I would have done more but I could see myself at 
23  feeling good about reporting it and let the powers that be handle it
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Vance <michael.vance at att.net>
Sender: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:58:14 
To: Northwestern Wildcats<nwu-sports at tssi.com>
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] McQueary remains on staff

Stephen-

My only problem with that is that he stuck around. If you are correct in your 
proposition that McQueary was simply too intimidated to say anything, he could 
have left the program any time in the last nine years. He could have told 
Paterno that he thought it was the right thing for his career to get some 
experience outside of the PSU system, gotten a letter of recommendation, and 
with that, gotten a job anywhere. But instead, he chose to stay among those who 
hid what he saw. Sorry, I don't have much sympathy for him.

-Michael
Sent from my mobile device...

On Nov 10, 2011, at 5:40 PM, "SjT \(Stephen J. Truog\)" <sjtruog at yahoo.com> 
wrote:

> McQueary is not innocent in all this like the players, so I won't defend him 
>with the voracity I used against the absurd suggestion to give the student 
>athletes on the team the "death penalty" ... BUT ...
>  
> He's a grad assistant and sees a living legend on campus committing a crime - 
>someone with powerful friends in high places and he is recognized as a witness. 
>He reports it to an even bigger living legend on campus and never hears anything 
>back.
>  
> What is he to assume? Either JoePa didn't take it up the ladder or the people 
>up the ladder rejected it -- in either case, the guy is being protected by 
>someone at PSU and who is he? Just some graduate assistant. If he presses the 
>issue, he can assume he will be fired, blacklisted or worse.
>  
> It's something he'll have to live with and it's inexcusible, but he had to 
>decide whether he wanted to accept what the powers that be had apparently 
>decided or push the issue and become a whistleblower, which takes great risk and 
>usually comes with attacks and questions of its own (just ask anyone who's 
>brought up sexual misconduct charges against a powerful political figure, or an 
>employee trying to expose corruption in corporate America).
>  
> It's easy to say what we would do in his shoes - but hopefully we'll never have 
>to be faced with that decision for real.
>  
> In any case, he's not the person the media mob of madness should be swarming 
>right now in their search for unquenchable headlines and justice. They need to 
>be on the lawns of Spanier, Sandusky and the AD ... dig into the files of the 
>university and local police, judges and district attorneys who knew of this ... 
>heck, they should be looking into the board of trustees themselves and what type 
>of environment they fostered and the type of people they hired (and why they 
>said they were shocked).
>  
> McQueary is not the iconic coach who had nothing to fear from blowing the 
>whistle, nor the people in power who knew more and did less -- he's the low man 
>on the totem poll who was too weak to follow up on a report of a crime (though 
>he did at least report it, which a lot of witnesses do not even do) because he 
>saw all of the people in power around him wanting to look the other way.
>  
> Not a profile in courage to be sure, but also not someone I want to focus the 
>spotlight on in the search for justice.
>  
> - Stephen
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> STEPHEN J. TRUOG
> sjtruog at yahoo.com
> GO CATS!!! GEAUX SAINTS!!!
> Super Bowl XLIV Champions! 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Jim Leonard <jleonard518 at yahoo.com>
> To: Northwestern Wildcats <nwu-sports at tssi.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 1:46 PM
> Subject: [NU Sports] McQueary remains on staff
> 
> NU Friends,
>  
> I am at a loss to understand how Mike McQueary remains on the payroll at Penn 
>State. By his own sworn grand jury testimony he saw a young boy being abused. 
>His only actions were to call his father and later tell Joe Paterno. For years 
>after that he must have seen Sandusky on campus and bowl trips with more young 
>children. I don't know how he can live with himself. 
>
>  
> A) He could have intervened in the shower room.
> B) He could have pulled the fire alarm and then run to a phone.
> C) He could have made an anonymous call to the police (his father could have 
>too, what's wrong with that guy?)
> D) He could have made follow-up inquiries to several different people. 
>  
> Since 1993 Penn State has been my second favorite Big Ten team. If they allow 
>him to remain on the payroll and represent the school on Saturday, that is over. 
>
>  
> To be clear, my issue with him has NOTHING to do with the law or legal 
>obligations. It had everything to do with being a person of clear conscience and 
>good character. Sadly, I think the reason that he has been kept on staff is that 
>if he is fired he's free to talk and he'll have A LOT more to say. 
>
>  
> Success with Honor - what a joke. 
>  
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports

_______________________________________________
nwu-sports site list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
_______________________________________________
nwu-sports site list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
_______________________________________________
nwu-sports site list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports

More information about the nwu-sports mailing list