[NU Sports] I understand Clark's frustration ... A bowl win has to be priority One ...

[Sportsbiz]

Nobody disputes that we want to win the bowl game but I wouldn't trade down
just to get a win.  The best bowl game you can get to does more for the
program in the long run that a win against a MAC school would do.  The
exposure is greater both in likely TV viewers and in recruiting, especially
in Texas a hot recruiting area.  Recruits tend to pay attention to things
like which bowl you go to not whether you win it. The bowl experience for
the players is also generally better as you move up the food chain because
there is more money to spend on the participants' activities in the week
leading up to the game, plus the SWAG also tends to be a bit better the
higher up you go although SWAG is also greatly influenced by the identity
of the title sponsor.

Bottom line, for the greater long-term benefit to the program, take the
bowl that is the highest up the food chain barring highly unusual
circumstances.
Mark
*

Mark S. Ament*
sportsbiz at gmail.com


*
*



On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Eric C West <e-west at northwestern.edu> wrote:

> Actually, Jeff, I think I'd suggest that the format change. That would be
> a pretty silly way to determine a championship. (Not to mention lots of
> schools would then work on all sorts of ways to fudge their graduation
> numbers, further compromising the already-shaky "student athlete" concept
> in most of the FBS.)
>
> I also take issue with the notion that no one outside NU team/fans "care"
> about merely winning a bowl game. The only thing that got mentioned about
> NU in Sunday's two-hour Bowl Selection Special on ESPN was that we haven't
> won a bowl game since 1949. This statistic is practically the first thing
> anyone in the media mentions when talking about the Wildcats. If we won a
> bowl game, that statistic would go away, and no one in the media would
> mention or even care who the bowl victory was against or how strong they
> were. I actually think the opposite of your statement is more true: the
> only people who care about beating a "strong" opponent in a bowl game are
> [among] us, the players and coaches on this team, and their families.
>
> And Harry, Meineke/Houston ain't the Rose, nor is it more thrilling than
> Fight Hunger/SF or Little Caesars/Detroit. A bowl is a bowl, and a win is a
> win.
>
> Eric West
> e-west at northwestern.edu
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com] On
> Behalf Of Beamsley, Jeff
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:18 PM
> To: Eric Kunkel; bwdolphin146 at yahoo.com; nwu-sports at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [NU Sports] I understand Clark's frustration ... A bowl win
> has to be priority One ...
>
> I appreciate the angst.
>
> I certainly share the hope that NU will prevail later this month.
>
> BUT
>
> In the larger scope of what's good for the program, winning bowl games is
> way down the list.  Getting invited to a bowl game is MUCH more important
> to both the current team and potential recruits.
>
> The only people who care about winning this bowl game are us, the players
> and coaches on this team, and their families.
>
> Here's a little thought experiment to hopefully prove my point.
>
> What if the playoff format was changed and the championship game was
> between the team that had the best ranking and the team that graduated the
> highest percentage of their athletes.  So NU got to play in the
> championship game pretty regularly.  Would we turn that down?  Would we
> suggest that the format change?  Would we stop trying to graduate everyone?
>
> No
>
> We would proudly represent the BT and do our best to win even though it
> might be against long odds.
>
> Same story here.
>
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com] On
> Behalf Of Eric Kunkel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:44 PM
> To: bwdolphin146 at yahoo.com; nwu-sports at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [NU Sports] I understand Clark's frustration ... A bowl win
> has to be priority One ...
>
>
>
>
>  Can't elaborate due to time commitments, but count me on Clark's side on
> this one.  If , since 1949 had won just one bowl game, this wouldn't be an
> issue.  I don't want to bring up bad karma, but its the only thread, and I
> mean the ONLY threaad that connects us to the Dark Ages, and it needs to be
> cut. Don't tell me some of you haven't thought the same thing.
>   With that said, I appreciate Mr. Phillips efforts as well as the well
> thought posts in regards to our bowl in Houston. Of course, I will be
> rooting for our Cats, who once again will be looking up a loaded barrell
> when they take the field 12/31.
>
> GO CATS!!          Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bwdolphin146 <bwdolphin146 at yahoo.com>
> To: nwu-sports <nwu-sports at tssi.com>
> Sent: Wed, Dec 7, 2011 12:57 am
> Subject: [NU Sports] I understand Clark's frustration ... A bowl win has
> to be priority One ...
>
>
> ...But I wouldn't say NU has no chance to win. The Aggies' pass defense is
> readful and assuming McCall cranks it up and NU doesn't get conservative on
> ffense the game should be competitive.
> That said, I agree with Clark that the only thing that matters is a bowl
> win.
> hat awful streak is an anchor on the NU program and it needs to end.
> Somehow.
> Brad Wilson
> ent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
> ______________________________________________
> wu-sports site list
> wu-sports at tssi.com
> ttp://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>