[NU Sports] IMHO - NU vs. Ill-noise

[Roy S. Lamberton]

Probably right about Wiscy - this is the make or break year for many of their Seniors, how many do they start? 17?

They want to make up for all of the losses we've inflicted over the years that knocked them out of various contentions... they'll be loaded for wildcat and we have a RS Frosh in his 2nd start.

Of course we were beaten by a RS Frosh today - only he didn't have to throw more than 14 times.

I'm not excited about a trip to Champaign next year, but at least Dan will be at the helm in one of his final games trying for the capstone of his college career.

And maybe IL-Noise's OC gets a Head job somewhere.

rsl



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Roy S. Lamberton - Senior Associate & Unix Guru.
Computer Applications & Support Associates
-------------------- Also ----------------------
"Commissioner" Delaware American Legion Baseball
Director Media Relations - Little League 
  Senior League Softball World Series
Retired Senior Chief Cryptologic Technician [R]
Northwestern University - Speech 1974 - 
Chi Phi: Pi 1974, KD 1968
Publisher Emeritus: Purple Reign (Fox Sports)
==========  Go Cats -  Beat 'em All  ===========

"...Then I get on my knees and pray,
WE DON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!" -- Pete Townsend

================================================


-----Original Message-----
From: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of Jim Bendat
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 8:38 PM
To: 'Northwestern Wildcats'
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] IMHO - NU vs. Ill-noise

Good points, except for the very last one. Wisconsin has a lot to prove: a win, and they're most likely going to the Rose Bowl.

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Roy S. Lamberton" <rstetson at capps-assoc.com>
>Sent: Nov 20, 2010 4:51 PM
>To: 'Northwestern Wildcats' <nwu-sports at tssi.com>
>Subject: [NU Sports] IMHO - NU vs. Ill-noise
>
>Just a few notes cast:
>
>1. Everyone expected Ill-noise to run up the middle on the traditional zone block spread
>running play. ILL came out and ran wide the first couple of downs. Our DE's were shading
>inside, ILL ran right by us.
>
>2. Evan W came out to throw long on the first offensive play. The Illini came out to
>blitz. Had we had the ball on the opening kickoff, that probably would have put us up 7-0,
>but the Zookers had the ball first, and ran around the edges for a TD.
>
>3. Once adjusted for the outside rush, ILL's OL blew massive holes up the middle (which we
>originally were expecting) and the guessing game began, which way do they run, inside with
>a FB or outside with the spread. Either way it didn't matter.
>
>4. Down 14-0, NU was scrambling on offense, just couldn't get the ball to our playmakers -
>Ebert and Dunsmore disappeared in the first half, and really the backup guys seemed to get
>more looks by Evan until later in the game.
>
>5. By the 4th quarter, the front 7 were gassed. The ILL-noise guys just kept bringing it
>and wore us out. Game, set, match.
>
>Zooker had that smirk on his face that said, I beat you today in your big game... Ha, Ha,
>Ha. Wait 'til next year.
>
>One comment I kept hearing from the TV guys was about how big the ILL linemen were. All
>over 6-6, etc. That was Gary B's system too, 5 giants, 6-7 at tackles 6-4 at guard and
>anyone smaller got a look at FB. You pound the defensive line until they break, then you
>run wild.
>
>The Ravens did it last year in the NFL, the Cowboys did it before then.
>
>Wisconsin might be different. We still have something to prove, they don't. Go Cats.
>
>rsl
>

_______________________________________________
nwu-sports site list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports