[NU Sports] Yesterday's video review

[Jim Bendat]

Jim, everything you wrote is true. I think the refs screwed up. It would be in keeping with the tenor of the entire broadcast, actually. Before they kicked off, the graphics read, EMU 3, NU 0. Just before we scored our first TD, the graphics went up as EMU 0, NU 6, as if we'd already scored. When we then went into the end zone, the graphics read EMU 0, NU 7 - before we'd kicked an extra point. When we then lined up for the PAT, the graphics read EMU 0, NU 9. -- Jim B.



-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Leonard <jleonard518 at yahoo.com>
>Sent: Sep 13, 2009 12:28 PM
>To: nwu-sports at tssi.com
>Subject: [NU Sports] Yesterday's video review
>
>Does anyone have a clear explanation of what happened in the second half yesterday when we turned the ball over on the punt? 
>
>It looked like Brendan Smith called for a fair catch and an EMU player interfered with his ability to catch it. That was lame, but it happens. So they give the ball to EMU 1st and 10. EMU runs a play. My understanding is that once you have another snap, the previous play cannot be reviewed. 
>
>So the refs set the ball up for 2nd and 7 (thereby clearly acknowledging that an official play had been run) and THEN say that the punt/turnover play is under review. After the turnover stood, they set it up as EMU's ball 1st and 10 AGAIN. They basically erased a play that occurred on the field. 
>
>I don't understand how that was possible.
>
>Go Cats!
>Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>      
>
>_______________________________________________
>nwu-sports site list
>nwu-sports at tssi.com
>http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports