[NU Sports] Yesterday's video review

[SjT (Stephen J. Truog)]

Technically, it shouldn't be possible but they'll probably use that "we got the buzzer right as the play was going off" argument.

It would be interesting to see how they would have handled that if the play had been more meaningful than a 3-yard run, like a TD or INT.

GO CATS!!!
-SjT

* * * * * * * * *
STEPHEN J. TRUOG
sjtruog at yahoo.com
GO CATS!!!


--- On Sun, 9/13/09, Jim Leonard <jleonard518 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Jim Leonard <jleonard518 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [NU Sports] Yesterday's video review
> To: nwu-sports at tssi.com
> Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 9:28 AM
> Does anyone have a clear explanation
> of what happened in the second half yesterday when we turned
> the ball over on the punt? 
> 
> It looked like Brendan Smith called for a fair catch and an
> EMU player interfered with his ability to catch it. That was
> lame, but it happens. So they give the ball to EMU 1st and
> 10. EMU runs a play. My understanding is that once you have
> another snap, the previous play cannot be reviewed. 
> 
> So the refs set the ball up for 2nd and 7 (thereby clearly
> acknowledging that an official play had been run) and THEN
> say that the punt/turnover play is under review. After the
> turnover stood, they set it up as EMU's ball 1st and 10
> AGAIN. They basically erased a play that occurred on the
> field. 
> 
> I don't understand how that was possible.
> 
> Go Cats!
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>