[NU Sports] BB Coaching Change? (fwd)

s.fridley at comcast.net s.fridley at comcast.net
Wed Feb 21 16:06:54 CST 2007


The timing of some of your comments is interesting.  I share your views on Carmody - that he is a great representative of NU and what it stands for.  I also share your frustration with our recruiting.

Re: no "leapers" - I agree these are in short supply.  Interestingly, Capocci, one of our freshmen next year, is apparently a terrific jumper.  I spoke briefly with his high school coach, who told me he "absolutely jumps out of the gym."  I've heard similar elsewhere, but we'll see next November.  Michael Thompson, our other recruit for next year, is very speedy.  

It has taken some time, but we are starting to get players out of the Chicago Public League after a long, long dry spell that far outstripped Carmody's tenure.  Previously, Carmody had some pyrrhic recruiting victories with Brandon Lee out of another talent hotbed, Peoria, and Gary Lee, from Flint, MI.  Unfortunately, while they signed on the bottom line they didn't last very long for reasons we already know.

The addition to the staff of Tavaras Hardy is apparently already reaping some benefits with regard to our recruiting visibility locally.  His knowledge of what it's like to be a student-athlete at NU combined with his winning personality will, I think, prove a big help to our efforts.

If you haven't been present when Carmody talks about recruiting I thought you might find this interesting:  I've heard Carmody talk about this quite a bit, and he is definitely not using our academic requirements as a crutch.  When asked, he sort of perfunctorily acknowledges that our academic standards make our net a little bit narrower and the job a little more challenging, but also disavows that as a big part of the problem.  He has consistently said that his biggest obstacle is the program's history, or lack thereof.  I also remember something Jitim said that I found interesting.  It's not just about our choice who to recruit based on academics.  Jitim played with everybody in Chicago over the summers, and he frequently heard from others something like, "Oh, man, why do you want to go to Northwestern and have to study so hard.  You have to be a superbrain to go there."  Jitim essentially said, no, you just have to go to class and do your work.  It's not all that big a deal.  Bu
t the perception's out there.  (Another reason I think Tavaras can help here - he can provide first hand info about what student work at NU is like.) Some of the recent articles in the Daily Herald about NU recruiting and the CPL were illuminating.  It's clear that NU is quite flexible in its admissions requirements for athletes, as long as they have decent grades which indicate a likelihood of college graduation.  

All things considered, I think our basketball job is the single toughest job in all of college sports.  Not as high-pressured as  some of the superelite football programs, but the toughest job in which to have real success.  Carmody's doing as well so far as anybody has, but if he can't do it, it might take an out-of-the-box solution like Kareem to get it done.  It's a shame that Kareem has never been offered an opportunity, and it's a further shame that for NU to be the school that offered would be appropriately seen as the very lowest rung on the ladder.

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: NEONRye at aol.com
> While it would be great to have a new venue for 'Cat Hoops, I don't really  
> think that is the problem.  I have never been to Cameron Indoor Arena, but  
> certainly, it is not state-of-the-art in any way, shape of form--except for (a)  
> the undergraduate talent wearing the "Blue Devils" jersey, (b) the fanatic  
> undergraduates in the seats, and (c) Coach "K".
>  
> I have been reluctant to join in this discussion, and have held back all  
> season, because I think Bill Carmody is an excellent representative of NU and  
> what it stands for.  However, if the goal is not only to have a "clean"  
> program, but to qualify for the NCAA Tournament some time in the next  century, 
> then 
> we just have to be able to recruit better players.  We are  too slow, too 
> small and too un-athletic (i.e., no "leapers").  Thus,  defensively and on the 
> boards we are generally pathetic, and occasionally rise  to mediocre.   
>  
> I think we need to go after somebody like a Kareem Abdul Jabbar, a  
> nationally-recognized figure, who also stands for academic excellence and  
> integrity, 
> and an individual who clearly wants to become a Head Coach.  I  think Kareem 
> has been mentioned before by others on the List.  Obviously,  as a legend of the 
> game and a man of unquestioned principles, he should be  able to recruit 
> successfully in the African-American community, which IMHO is a  sine qua non 
> for 
> significant progress with our program.   Frankly, I think we have avoided this 
> issue out of a sense of political  correctness, but it is inescapable.  All 
> you have to do is turn on the tube  or go to a game.  We are a predominantly 
> Caucasian team in a sport in which  African-Americans have excelled, for a 
> variety of reasons.  And, if  anything, that trend has intensified during the 
> Carmody Era, as he has  shown some recruiting prowess in Eastern Europe, but not 
> East Chicago or  Gary or St. Louis.     
>  
> What I am saying is that President Bienen and Mark Murphy need to think  "out 
> of the box" here.  We have a virtually-unmatched record of futility in  terms 
> of the NCAA Tournament.  I believe that our failure to ever make the  
> Tournament is more of an embarassment than our record-setting losing streak on  
> the 
> gridiron in the 1980's.  It's just that we have somehow flown under the  radar 
> with it.  And we can't use "academics" as a crutch forever.   When I see 
> Vanderbilt beat Florida, I know that the canard of "We can't recruit  basketball 
> players because they don't have the grades or the SAT's" is a  lame excuse that 
> has outlived its useful life.  
>  
> I would never say that we should take junior college transfers or players  
> who can't cut it in the classroom, but by the same token, other "pseudo-Ivy"  
> schools manage to hire coaches and recruit players who generate the "critical  
> mass" of talent and instruction which enables them to make the Tournament.   
> And I haven't heard anyone say that Vandy or Stanford or Duke have somehow  
> depreciated their reputations as top-class institutions of learning by fielding  
> competitive (and, in some cases, championship-caliber) hoops teams.  Why  can't 
> we?  I am not asking for the "Final Four:" here; in fact, I probably  would 
> be happy making the "Play-In Game".:-)  
>  
> Paul Levinson
>  
>  
> <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> Check out free AOL at 
> http://free.aol.com/thenewaol/index.adp.  Most comprehensive set of free 
> safety and security tools, millions of free high-quality videos from across the 
> web, free AOL Mail and much more.
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports



More information about the nwu-sports mailing list