[NU Sports] The finality of it all
johnadeg at comcast.net
johnadeg at comcast.net
Mon Dec 3 13:47:58 CST 2007
We were at that Hawaii game and if the fix wasn't in with the officials then it might as well have been. Theythey were about the worst bunch I've ever seen. MSU had the same experience that NU had the next week. Let's hope Hawaii gets blown out in their bowl game.
John DeGroat
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: WildElk2 at aol.com
> Sure, we all knew we weren't going any place, but now that it's official, it
> hurts (although not like the late night punch in the stomach at Hawaii in
> 2004 debacle). I was looking at the Big 10 standings, and I wonder if beating
> Duke would have mattered? When Indiana beat Purdue, and Michigan St. beat
> Penn St., they would have both jumped ahead of us in the pecking order. We'd
> really be pissed if we went 7-5 and stayed home. Now if we're playing the what
> if game: let's let the loss to Duke stand. If we beat Iowa or Michigan (I'm
> not counting Purdue, as they put it to us in the 4th Q.) , games that we
> gave away and finish 7-5, do we go to a bowl?
> At 6-6, I think most of us know, what with our easiest schedule in ages,
> we didn't deserve a bowl. No big wins, unlike the 2003 season in which we
> finished 6-6 and corralled Wisconsin (16-7 was it?).
> I'm not sure how to look at this season. I talk out of both sides of my
> mouth. With Bacher the starter all season, we had a passing game that kept
> defenses guessing. That alone merits improvement. But 6 wins against a
> mediocre schedule; I wonder if we're any better than the 2-3 we posted to end
> 2006
> with Bacher? Sure, that included a miracle win by MSU; so say we win that
> game like we should; Was 2007 better than a 3-2 record Bacher piloted in
> 2006?
> I'm still surprised how weak our defensive front seven was. Whether it
> was a bad game or not, Brad W. from our list commented how poor our tackling
> was vs. Illinois; in our 12th game. We looked like a bad high school team at
> times. The idea is to take 2 and 3 star recruits and get them better after
> two or three years. That has happened on offense; but not on defense. 2004
> was the last year we had a good defense, save the book end losses vs. TCU and
> Hawaii.
> On offense, we moved the ball, but when it was crunch time, we struggled.
> Still, our "big" problem is on defense. (Note: our special teams were
> better; we went from an F in 2006 to a C this season)
> After 6 years, it's time for a change. Whether it's a recruiting issue,
> or technique, Colby has got to go. Giving a person 6 years to get results in
> D-! football doesn't happen anymore. I'm glad NU is patient, but as much as
> I believe Colby was safe after the 2005 season in which our defense was
> porous, it hasn't got much better.
> Oh well. A long off-season begins.
>
> GO CATS!!! Eric
>
>
>
> **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
> products.
> (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
> _______________________________________________
> nwu-sports site list
> nwu-sports at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
More information about the nwu-sports
mailing list