[NU Sports] Potential Football Rules Changes
Dennis W. Brandt
tbng at suscom.net
Fri Feb 10 09:52:19 CST 2006
They forgot some real rule changes, two of which will speed up the game by
eliminating reviews.
1. Use the NFL rule that states that a ball carrier who falls to the ground
without being touched may get up and continue the play. If this rule exists
to reduce injuries, I have seen no evidence that injuries have occurred in
the NFL due to the absence of the rule. It's dumb to say, "Oops! You
slipped. You're down. Play over." The idea is for the opposition to stop
you.
2. NFL, you also listen up: LET THE GROUND CAUSE A FUMBLE! It used to, and
it worked just fine. It is ridiculous to say that a ball carrier hits the
ground, loses possession, but - oops! - his knee was down 3 nanoseconds
before, or he hits the turf headfirst, the ball pops out, and voila!
Maintain possession. The result of the rule is to lengthen games with
reviews because it is often impossible for refs to discern events at real
speed and/or amid a gang of tacklers. Either the ball carrier maintains
possession or he doesn't. This includes the endzone.
3. Likewise, listen up NFL: Zap the "breaking the plane" rule. If we
needed yet more evidence of how dumb that rule is, think no further than
Roethlisberger's phantom touchdown in the Super Bowl, just the last of
thousands of such examples. Once more, the game halted while the refs
looked at the replays again and again and again. If Big Ben had to have
actually gotten a knee into the endzone, the call was easy. No TD. Yes, it
contradicts the position-of-the-ball-when-the-knee-touches rule. Use it out
in the field, but make the ball carrier actually enter the endzone for a
score. Inconsistent? I don't care.
More information about the nwu-sports
mailing list