[NU Sports] Recruiting Rankings

[warneradams]

1) "The fact that Stanford, Duke and Vanderbilt were ranked well above NU 
says a lot."

Average Recruiting Rankings from 2002-2005:

Stanford 35.25
Duke     61.75
Vandy    67.25
NU       60.75

Average Wins from 2002-2005:

Stanford 3.75
Duke     2.25
Vandy    2.75
NU       5.50

2) "no one from NU could even get [Stanford's Kwame Harris] inteersted?"

Is this true?  He only started two years at Stanford (2002-2003) (where they
won a grand total of 6 games).  

Meanwhile, our starting right tackle for much of 2002 and all of 2003 was
just named our first FWAA All American in 5 years and our starting left
tackle in 2002-2003 is playing in the Super Bowl on Sunday.  Maybe we
weren't that interested?

3) "Maybe somone(sic) should ask Murphy why he chose Colgate over NU?"

Mark Murphy went to Clarence High School in western New York and he said
last year in an on-line interview that he chose Colgate for its proximity to
home and its academics.  They offered no scholarships.  Academics were
evidently important to him since he later obtained his MBA in 1983 from
American University while playing in the NFL and a later law degree from
Georgetown University. 



-----Original Message-----
From: nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:nwu-sports-bounces at tssi.com] On
Behalf Of John A. DeGroat
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:40 PM
To: Jim Leonard
Cc: nwu-sports at tssi.com
Subject: Re: [NU Sports] Recruiting Rankings

Jim Leonard's comments are typical of the NU mindset that was forged 
during the horrendous losing streak that was  experienced when NU 
students to show how smart they thought that they were reduced to 
yelling at opposing players "you'll be working for us".  Being a top 
athlete doesn't make a person a dope, but that is the message that the 
NU mindset sends.  An imaginative coach, which we don't have, combined 
with a super smart AD like Murphy should be able to draw top athletes 
who can make it academically at NU.  Maybe somone should ask Murphy why 
he chose Colgate over NU.  come to think of it, a great market research 
project would be to ask top athletes with top SATs why they went 
somewhere other than NU.  I can give you a sammpling of one.  There were 
two brothers, top in their classes in Newark, Delaware who chose 
Stanford nad Miami ovr NU.  Why?, no one from NU could even get them 
inteersted.  One kid now plays for the 49ers and the othr kid will 
probablly be a top draft choice.

The fact that Stanford, Duke and Vanderbilt were ranked well above NU 
says a lot .

John DeGroat


Jim Leonard wrote:

>Fellow Wildcat Faithful,
>
>I would certainly enjoy seeing 4.0 star recruits headed to NU, but
>realistically, not many of them have the near 4.0 GPAs that we require. 
>
>The reality for NU, and other academic schools like Vanderbilt, Stanford,
and
>the service academies, you have to take what you can get in terms of raw
>athletic talent and win through player development (coaching) and a system
that
>compliments your available talent (coaching). 
>
>I remember reading that the seniors on the '95 Rose Bowl team, as a
recruiting
>class, were ranked #92. Ever since, I haven't put much stock in recruiting
>class rankings. 
>
>Now, whether or not we have the right coaches in place to develop our
recruits
>is an entirely different conversation. 
>
>Victory & Honor,
>Jim
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>
>_______________________________________________
>nwu-sports site list
>nwu-sports at tssi.com
>http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
nwu-sports site list
nwu-sports at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/nwu-sports