[Husker] Turnovers

[Scott Stewart]

I assume you are talking B1G Championship game? We lost three turnovers and
got none in return. I know that didn't rack up 70 points, but our first
play from scrimmage was a pick 6 to put us down 14. That sure allowed them
to dictate their strategy. Run, Run, Run.

Had we had them down 14-0 three minutes into the game, they  may not have
had that opportunity.




On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I've got 63 reasons.... no...wait... 70! reasons why turnovers were not
> Nebraska's biggest problem this season.  That's not to say that turnovers
> weren't an issue.
>
> Just that it wasn't Nebraska's biggest problem
>
> Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
>
> --- On Sun, 1/27/13, Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Turnovers
> To: "Glenn Baker" <baker370 at att.net>
> Cc: "Mike Jaixen" <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>, "husker at tssi.com" <
> husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Sunday, January 27, 2013, 9:24 PM
>
> Maybe I'll dig into this, but my hunch says that turnovers are, other than
> scoring defense, the most highly correlated to winning statistic there is.
>
> So, from that standpoint, it's probably not hyperbole to say that
> turnovers are the biggest problem NU faces.
>
> On Jan 27, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Glenn  Baker <baker370 at att.net> wrote:
>
> > This article said something we all know if you turn the  ball over more
> than your opponent you are likely to lose. Duh!!!!
> >
> > Sent from my iPod
> >
> > On Jan 27, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Wouldn't you expect that anyway?  I don't think I learned a darned
> thing from that article.  You're more likely to win the game if you end up
> on the positive side of turnover differential?  No kidding.  Nebraska
> turned the ball over a lot this year?  No kidding.
> >>
> >> And I had to chuckle when I read the introduction in the morning paper
> that called turnovers "the biggest problem facing Big Red".
> >>
> >> Mike Jaixen
> >> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> >> http://www.cornnation.com
> >>
> >> --- On Sun, 1/27/13, Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net>
> >> Subject: [Husker] Turnovers
> >> To: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
> >> Date: Sunday, January 27, 2013, 7:55 PM
> >>
> >> Interesting piece in today's OWH about turnovers. Nothing surprising,
> but the stats are rather stark: In the 68 games since Pelini became head
> coach, NU is 35-2 when it wins or ties in TO margin (including 8-1 against
> ranked teams). When the Huskers lose the turnover battle, they are 13-18
> (0-11 against ranked teams).
> >>
> http://dataomaha.com/documents/husker-turnovers-a-look-at-nebraskas-slippery-slope
> >>
> >> -- Dick Karre
> >> dkarre at comcast.net
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> husker site list
> >> husker at tssi.com
> >> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> husker site list
> >> husker at tssi.com
> >> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>