[Husker] Dynasties

[Theodore Heise]

So I'm just now getting time to read this, thanks for sharing your 
work.

Overall, most impressive!  That said, I did have a few comments 
and/or questions.

How did you happen to choose p=0.10 as the level of signifcance? 
Were any of the significant differences still siginificant at a 
level of p=0.05?

In the discussion of the red zone in section 1.4, you might consider 
saying something about the 21-30 ranked teams.  Some might argue 
that ignoring this is a bit biased.

Again, very nice work!

-- 
Theodore (Ted) Heise     <theo at heise.nu>     Bloomington, IN, USA





On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Scott Stewart wrote:

> I concur.
>
> NU lines should be Red and Bammer's lines White. That way they 
> will appear as insignificant on paper as they are in reality. LOL. 
> WDE!
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Nick Chevance <nickchevance at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> And in classic piling on mode, I too applaud the analysis.  Very 
>> nice.
>>
>> My only complaint - Why are the NU lines on the graphs in blue, 
>> and Bama in red.  That just seems .... wrong, somehow.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:13 AM, David Elfering <aroundomaha at gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll ditto what some others have said and applaud. Excellent analysis!