[Husker] TO

[Matt]

I don't follow the (men's?) basketball that much, but I didn't think that
everyone had soured on Coach Sadler. Actually I thought he had a few bad
injury breaks that really hurt. Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy with
Coach Miles, but I'm not sure Doc got an extra year that he shouldn't have.

I really can't think of anything that TO did as AD that was a complete
misstep, even in hindsight. Not trying to fan a flame war, I appreciate
your opinion. I just can't say I agree...
 On Feb 18, 2013 7:41 PM, "RJ Wessel" <da_huskers at cox.net> wrote:

> I also thought he should have left earlier. Everyone knew something needed
> to be done in the basketball department. The new arena was done, Football
> stable - not great not terrible but stable. At least the new AD should have
> been done a year sooner and let him put some signature on a program for
> himself.
>
> That is 20/20 hindsight. I also thought he should have handed over the
> offense calling duties a year early so Solich would have a year under his
> belt. He also should not have hamstringed anybody on what changes could be
> made to the coaching staff. again that is all 20/20 hindsight.
>
> So I guess I would say TO was not perfecdt - but heck none of us are. So
> what, you do the best you can with what you know.
>
>
> ---- Jerry Budd <gbudd at roadrunner.com> wrote:
>
> =============
> That would depend on whether it was a serious complaint?  Sounds like it
> wasn't (but it was a complaint).  No offense btw...
>
> I am also curious why you said he stayed too long though.  Is there
> something he did, or didn't do that you didn't like, or thought was poorly
> handled?  Or would have been handled better by someone else?
>
> Jerry
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Oh hell no.
> >
> > I think he stayed too long.  You can't seriously accuse me of
> complaining for saying that.
> >
> > Paul Dalen
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Jerry Budd <gbudd at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You just did.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> He was what we needed in 2007 and 2008. He stayed too long.
> >>>
> >>> But he is TO and I'm not going to complain.
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> A person sent the following to Tom Shatel at the tail end of his
> "Lunch With Tom" segment today:
> >>>>
> >>>> "Don't you think these inductions to Hall of Fames and 'roasts' and
> parades and displays of affection for Tom Osborne are a little overdone,
> especially since he did a terrible job as AD?"
> >>>>
> >>>> This has all the earmarks of a troll (to his credit, Shatel didn't
> take the bait), but I'm curious whether anyone on the list agrees with the
> notion that TO did a "terrible job" as AD, and if so why.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dick Karre
> >>>> dkarre at comcast.net
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> husker site list
> >>>> husker at tssi.com
> >>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> husker site list
> >>> husker at tssi.com
> >>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> husker site list
> >> husker at tssi.com
> >> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>