[Husker] TO

[Jerry Budd]

That would depend on whether it was a serious complaint?  Sounds like it wasn't (but it was a complaint).  No offense btw...

I am also curious why you said he stayed too long though.  Is there something he did, or didn't do that you didn't like, or thought was poorly handled?  Or would have been handled better by someone else?

Jerry

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh hell no. 
> 
> I think he stayed too long.  You can't seriously accuse me of complaining for saying that. 
> 
> Paul Dalen
> 
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Jerry Budd <gbudd at roadrunner.com> wrote:
> 
>> You just did.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> He was what we needed in 2007 and 2008. He stayed too long. 
>>> 
>>> But he is TO and I'm not going to complain. 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> A person sent the following to Tom Shatel at the tail end of his "Lunch With Tom" segment today:
>>>> 
>>>> "Don't you think these inductions to Hall of Fames and 'roasts' and parades and displays of affection for Tom Osborne are a little overdone, especially since he did a terrible job as AD?"
>>>> 
>>>> This has all the earmarks of a troll (to his credit, Shatel didn't take the bait), but I'm curious whether anyone on the list agrees with the notion that TO did a "terrible job" as AD, and if so why.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Dick Karre
>>>> dkarre at comcast.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> husker site list
>>>> husker at tssi.com
>>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> husker site list
>>> husker at tssi.com
>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker