[Husker] Big 10 to increase number of league games.

[Skylar Dodds]

Profit is a bad figure to use because a lot of places (like Nebraska) will attempt to break even at the end of the year.

--
Skylar

Sent from my Google Nexus 10

Gerald Jensen <answerman1 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>If it results in one less home game every few years, and programs like OSU and Michigan aren't afraid of it, then Nebraska shouldn't be as well.
>
> 
> 
>This is a very short-sighted statement. Nebraska is no where close to the financial league of O-State and Michigan. I am placing a chart in the body, of this message, if it does not pass the Mike's server let me know and I will attach it. Nebraska is much closer to the bottom of the BIG than the top. Notice O-State had a $10,000,000 profit Michigan had a $10,000,000 profit Penn State had a $15,000,000 profit Nebraska had a $1.5 million profit. We barely break even. Also note neither Penn State nor Ohio State receive any school subsidy and Michigan receives a pittance.
> 
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>School
>
>Revenue
>
>Expenses 
>
>Subsidies
>
>
>Ohio State 
>
>$131,815,821 
>
>$122,286,869
>
>$0
>
>
>Michigan
>
>$122,739,052
>
>$111,844,553 
>
>$272,684
>
>
>Penn State 
>
>$116,118,025
>
>$101,336,483
>
>$0
>
>
>Wisconsin
>
>$96,288,191 
>
>$95,623,345
>
>$7,237,901 
>
>
>Iowa
>
>$93,353,56
>
>$88,057,486
>
>$564,680 
>
>
>Mich State 
>
>$84,510,199 
>
>$84,004,229
>
>$3,650,280
>
>
>Nebraska 
>
>$83,679,756 
>
>$81,916,484
>
>$0
>
>
>Minnesota
>
>$78,924,683
>
>$78,924,683
>
>$7,778,861
>
>
>Illinois 
>
>$77,863,883
>
>$73,476,818
>
>$3,983,640
>
>
>Indiana
>
>$71,017,355
>
>$69,314,511
>
>$2,686,769
>
>
>Purdue 
>
>$66,202,493
>
>$59,429,383
>
>$0 
>
>
>Northwestern
>
>N/A
>
>N/A
>
>N/A 
>  		 	   		  
>_______________________________________________
>husker site list
>husker at tssi.com
>http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker