[Husker] New B1G scheduling

[Shawn Sherlock]

The Kansas Regents have made it quite clear that splitting up KU & KSU isn't an option when it comes to the conference realignments. Granted, for the dollar amount and assurance that both schools are in BCS conferences might change that. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 29, 2012, at 5:18 PM, "gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com" <gzimmerman5 at kc.rr.com> wrote:

> KU has a HUGE presence in KC. More than MU or KSU.
> 
> Greg Zimmerman, UNL '75
> Overland Park, Kansas
> 
> Sent from my HTC smartphone on the Now Network from Sprint!
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: nolan at tssi.com (Mike Nolan)
> To: <dkarre at comcast.net>
> Cc: <husker at tssi.com>
> Subject: [Husker] New B1G scheduling
> Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2012 11:54 am
> 
> 
>> On 11/29/2012 10:33 AM, Richard Wessel wrote:
>>> With the way things have gone. Would ISU and KSU deserve a look??
>> 
>> Some have speculated Kansas.
> 
> Kansas doesn't bring a lot of TV sets to the table.  (They don't have a big
> following in the KC metro area, though one could make the same argument about
> Rutgers and NYC, I suppose.)
> 
> I wonder if college football might wind up following the lead of the major pro 
> sports and allow a 16 team conference to have conference semi-finals before the
> conference championships?
> 
> Think of a conference that consists these divisions:  
> 
> Nebraska           
> Iowa
> Minnesota
> Illinois
> 
> Wisconsin
> Northwestern
> Purdue
> School 1 to be named later
> 
> Michigan
> Penn State
> Rutgers
> Indiana
> 
> Ohio State
> Michigan State
> Maryland
> School 2 to be named later
> 
> Nebraska might play Wisconsin in one semifinal game while Michigan and
> Ohio State play in the other semifinal.  
> --
> Mike Nolan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker