[Husker] New B1G scheduling

Glenn Baker baker370 at att.net
Thu Nov 29 09:39:25 CST 2012


Hey Shawn,
 I played soccer in Europe and in college.  I still love to watch it but I love 
watching the Huskers even more. All this talk about the ne B1G scheduling is 
making my head hurt.

Glenn Baker




________________________________
From: Shawn Sherlock <shawnsherlock at sbcglobal.net>
To: Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
Cc: "husker at tssi.com" <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Thu, November 29, 2012 9:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] New B1G scheduling

I know I'm in the minority, but I would love to see a round robin style. Which 
is why i prefer the 12 team conference. Everyone gets two non con games, then 
you play everyone else. I would also like to be the tie breaker some sort of 
formula based on points scored vs points allowed in conference play. 


NOTE: I am a soccer fan. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Or just drop the idea of playing everybody in your division.  Keep it at five 
>division games and three against the other division.  Rotate opponents annually 
>so there isn't as long of a break between games.
> 
> Keep in mind that the B1G is likely headed to 16 teams, so even a nine game 
>schedule doesn't solve these problems.  A nine game conference schedule also 
>presents a risk to the conference in strength of schedule discussions. The 
>non-conference game that will be dropped will not be the 1-AA "body bag" games, 
>but rather a more competitive non-conference game.  Teams need 7 home games for 
>revenue, so if you make teams go on the road for five conference games one 
>season, they'll need all three non-conference games to be home games.
> 
> Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
> 
> --- On Thu, 11/29/12, Andy Knipp <andy at knipp.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Andy Knipp <andy at knipp.com>
> Subject: [Husker] New B1G scheduling
> To: "'Husker List'" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Thursday, November 29, 2012, 9:04 AM
> 
> OK, I am thinking about the 14 team conference and how the B1G may handle
> things.  Does anyone know how the SEC handles 14 teams ? 
> 
> With the current setup,  NU plays each division team (5 more), plus
> designated rival (PSU) and 2 of the remain 5 teams in the other division,
> totaling 8 games, plus 4 non-conf games, B1G champ and bowl makes a 14 game
> season.
> 
> Toss on more team each division and you have 2 choices:
> 
>    An 8 game conf schedule, with designated rival, leaves room for 1
> team from the other division, played 2 years in a row, takes 12 years to
> scroll through the teams.  Not workable. You could ditch the designated
> rival and scroll though playing 2 of 7 teams every 2 years, a 6 or 8    year
> cycle.  Of course the B1G would have to rejigger the divisions because they
> will never go without UM/OSU playing every year. 
> 
>    A 9 game conf schedule seems more likely to me.  Keep designated
> rival and then play 2 of 6 teams every 2 years, keeps the cycle at 6
> years.  But that will mean that teams drop a non-conference team (I do not
> see 15 game seasons becoming the norm, if they are even    allowed
> 
> 
> Are there any other scenarios out there ? 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker


More information about the husker mailing list