[Husker] CBS News recants Paterno death

[scott71lawson at yahoo.com]

Is this a serious post?

Scott in NY

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 24, 2012, at 2:40 AM, CeeReisser <chrissski at yahoo.com> wrote:

> CBS News recanted the rumor it announce in the major media world that Joe Paterno Died in Jan 22 2012 of a Chemo complication.  They took it strictly as a rumor from Onward State, a student newspaper at PSU that denied publishing the rumor as well.  After CBS announced his death, Jay and Scott Paterno Tweeted that their Father was not dead, but "still fighting"...
> Did this Mafia Don have a staged funeral or what?  Was there really a body or authentic Corners report? Was this death rumor just a way to avoid investigation/prosecution?
> It is quite coincidental that he was "reported" dead on the birth of his fall from his self -created media throne. This guy was real shady in life, and no one has proven if he's really dead yet either.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Scott Stewart <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
> To: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> 
> Cc: husker at tssi.com 
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Penn State's Penalties
> 
> It is against their previous rulings, but the President of the NCAA clearly
> stated in press releases that the Death Penalty was on the table for PSU.
> Maybe when he got to talking about it cooler heads prevailed. Though it is
> hard to blame the NCAA, PSU has become a flashpoint.
> 
> However, I would argue that it would be just as appropriate, and far more
> damaging for the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools to
> review their accreditation. In my opinion, this was an institutional
> problems that involved sports. It was not a rogue football coach or AD. It
> was a University President that couldn't do what he was legally mandated to
> do because he felt pressure from a football coach. I don't think that is
> football's problem, nor really do I see it as JoPa's problem (even though
> he also made poor choices). But ultimately the University's reputation and
> future are on the President's shoulders. In that way, I agree with the
> message the NCAA is sending. I just don't know if they were the appropriate
> body to send it.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/23/2012 2:27 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>> 
>>> Also, I see this as essentially taking the "Death Penalty" off the table.
>>> Because if you decide to give out a penalty for child abuse and don't use
>>> it...What kind of infraction deserves it? Paying a player....Really?
>>> (Personally, I think the "death penalty" could be appropriate for JS...but
>>> not figuratively).
>>> 
>>> 
>> Is it not the case that the death penalty is reserved for situations in
>> which the offending institution is already on probation? If so, the NCAA's
>> rules may not have allowed it here.
>> 
>> --
>> Dick Karre
>> dkarre at comcast.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/**mailman/listinfo/husker<http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker>
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker