[Husker] Penn State's Penalties
Andy Knipp
andy at knipp.com
Mon Jul 23 08:34:21 CDT 2012
Ouch.
I wonder if PSU has agreed to not appeal/sue over these charges. I certainly
think the NCAA is overreaching. Now I also think it would be worse for PSU's
image if they did take this to court.
I will be surprised if this is the end of it.
-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Mike Jaixen
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 6:27 AM
To: Husker List
Subject: [Husker] Penn State's Penalties
You decide if this is worse than the death penalty. It's a tough call.
* Football scholarships cut from 25 per year to 15. Penn State will only
have 45 scholarship football players in the 2016 season.
* 4 year bowl ban.
* All current and incoming football players can transfer immediately without
having to sit out a year.
* All victories from 1998 vacated.
* $60 million fine - to be used to fund child abuse protection programs.
>From a Husker perspective, this is preferable to the death penalty or a TV
ban because it keeps the schedule intact and keeps the Nebraska/Penn State
game on TV.
>From a Penn State perspective, you might prefer a shorter death penalty and
start over sooner. If you were being recruited by Penn State, you are
rethinking your commitment this morning because you (a) will not be going to
a bowl game ever (unless you redshirt a year) and (b) a scholarship may not
be available anyway. Penn State will be a glorified 1-AA team by the time
2016 rolls around.
Mike Jaixen
http://huskermike.blogspot.com
http://www.cornnation.com
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list