[Husker] Just an idea for Penn State

[Andy Knipp]

OSU tried (and IMHO succeeded) the same thing when their issues came out. I
really thought OSU would get stomped on by the NCAA but they really did not
do anything beyond OSU's self imposed penalties



-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
David Strong
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 9:16 AM
To: husker at tssi.com
Subject: [Husker] Just an idea for Penn State

Mark Emmert has made it pretty clear the NCAA is going to bring the hammer
to Penn State.  Sanctions will be heavy, if not the death penalty.  See
below:  (this is called a reference link so that others can read the article
for themselves.  If anyone ever asks you for one, don't be bothered by
it...it's very common practice and not personal.)

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/53285/ncaa-president-mulling-psu-pe
nalties

What if the PS board of trustees made the decision on their own to put the
football program in abeyance for a year?  There may be some benefits from
doing this:

1. They may be able to head off the NCAA.  If you do it yourself, rather
than have the NCAA do it to you, you restore some good will to the
University, and you have more control of the phase-out and phase-in.
2. They may be able to head off more lingering penalties from the NCAA.
You can claim that you have given yourself the ultimate penalty and
therefore no need to pile on with loss of scholies, TV, and post-season.
3. If they can pull it off for just one year, they *may* be able to keep the
staff and processes going without too much interruption.
4. After the year, you "re-launch" a new and improved football program.
New safeguards, standards, culture. Tweak the unis a little bit to show a
difference between the old way of doing things and the new.
5. Big 10 can treat all PS games as forfeits and put a win in in the column
of everyone who played them. Keeps it very easy to manage for one year.  Of
course, may be some push back from those schools w/o PS on the schedule, but
you could probably get them in line for the sake of the conference.

Some keys:
1. Try to get the NCAA to buy-in to letting all players who stay keep the
year of eligibility 2. Allow the school to continue to recruit during the
off year.

I'm sure there are a ton of holes in this that I haven't thought of, but on
a lot of levels it could work.  I think a lot of people want to see the Penn
State program punished, but not crippled for many years.  This would hurt no
doubt, but maybe not as bad as other longer term penalties or a NCAA imposed
dp.

Dave
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker