[Husker] Penn State

[Roger Lohr]

Kathy, I agree with you...'isn't membership in a conference meant to be more 
than just about sports?'

The issue at hand is certainly much more than about sports.  It is about the 
integrity, leadership, and and honesty of some of the top officials at that 
university.  The issue at hand is related to the football program, but the issue 
has nothing to do with sports.  PSU didn't gain any apparent unfair advantage in 
football due to the rape of many boys.  (They perhaps did retain their head
coach.)

IF in near future the assumptions/claims being made now are proved to be valid 
pertaining to the 'hush' of Sandusky's misdeeds, I believe there are valid 
reasons to question whether PSU should remain a member of B1G.

Roger Lohr-Mpls



________________________________
From: Kathy Jackson <kj60028 at windstream.net>
To: husker at tssi.com
Sent: Thu, July 5, 2012 4:50:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Penn State

I guess I get his point, but isn't membership in a conference meant to be more 
than just about sports?  I mean, all the talk about the academic advantage when 
we joined the conference.  If you want to have the discussion, shouldn't we look 
at everything not just athletics?  Just throwing out some questions.

Kathy Jackson
On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Dick Karre wrote:

> Lee Barfknecht asks (without necessarily answering) whether the B1G should kick 
>PSU out of the league. I can't see it happening, and I don't think it should, 
>but I suppose I could be convinced.
> http://www.omaha.com/article/20120703/SPORTS/707039883
> 
> -- 
> Dick Karre
> dkarre at comcast.net
> 

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker