[Husker] B1G Divisions

[Andy Knipp]

I like the idea.  Say team A plays Indiana, Illinois and Purdue. B has PSU,
Wisky and OSU.  B wins head to head with A but loses to 2 of the other
division teams, while team A wins all 3.  

BTW,  heard that Alvarez will coach Wisky in the Rose Bowl.  Arkansas had to
get moving on coaches and recruits so there was no way that they could wait
until Jan for the coach to arrive.  Whether BA was wanted him to coach is
questionable at best as well. 




-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Matt
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:54 AM
To: Steve Reichenbach
Cc: husker at tssi.com
Subject: Re: [Husker] B1G Divisions

Hm... thinking it through, you could have a team go 6-2 in the B1G, but 6-0
in their division... and they would go in ahead of a team that's 7-1 in the
B1G but 5-1 in their division...

Not hating the idea but that's an ugly worse case scenario, IMHO.
On Dec 6, 2012 8:25 AM, "Steve Reichenbach" <reich at inetnebr.com> wrote:

> As the divisions get bigger, one thing that I would like to see is to 
> have the division championship be based on in-division games only.
> That is especially true if there are designated cross-divisional 
> rivalries, which make for unequal schedules.
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker