[Husker] PAC-12 will not expand

[David Strong]

Talk about not getting it.  A team where some are more equal than others
doesn't work.  That's pretty simple.  Like those reports that Texas was
considering the ACC "so they could keep the Longhorn Network" .  The ACC is
an equal revenue sharing conference and they aren't going to change.  If the
Big 12 is going to work, UT is going to have to give up something.  OU, and
anyone else who has an escape route, should bring the hammer on them.

Dave

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com> wrote:

> UT is either brilliant or moronic in its refusal to consider any equal
> revenue sharing deal. It's on the record from last year that equal
> revenue was a large part of NUs decision to leave and now the PAC12 is
> backing away because UT is still opposed to it.
>
> Dodds isn't dumb. An asshole perhaps, but not dumb. So I can't figure
> out why they are staying this course.
>
> Is the ESPN investment messing with the decision calculus?
>
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 23:24, David Strong <gobigredlist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is getting pretty weird.
> >
> >
> http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6998751/pac-12-officials-decide-expansion
> >
> > Dave
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>