[Husker] Nebraska should be 16??

[Skylar Dodds]

That's fair.  I guess in my head I have a certain idea of what a top 10 team
should look like and we don't seem to fit the bill.  Maybe nobody does yet
:)

If I had to give it one word as to why?  Inconsistent.

I think we have the potential to be top 10. 

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Aaron Wolfson
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:24 AM
To: Mike Nolan
Cc: Lori Windsor; Larry Windsor; Husker
Subject: Re: [Husker] Nebraska should be 16??

I agree with Mike. In a vacuum, sure, #9 sounds like it's too high, but when
you actually compare the Huskers to the teams that would jump them, how many
of them have really showed more so far than Nebraska?


Aaron


On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mike Nolan <nolan at tssi.com> wrote:

> > Do you agree with this guy's assessment that Nebraska is a "third tier"
> > team and should be ranked #16?
>
> >
>
http://eye-on-collegefootball.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/24156338/3
2112993
>
> His definition of 'third tier' is kind of weird, but based on how they've
> played and WHO they've played, I think Wisconsin and Nebraska could both
> be a bit overrated.  The challenge is finding schools worthy of being
> rated higher than Nebraska, because quite a few of the top 25 schools
> have played pretty lame schedules so far.
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker