[Husker] Nebraska should be 16??

[Aaron Wolfson]

I agree with Mike. In a vacuum, sure, #9 sounds like it's too high, but when
you actually compare the Huskers to the teams that would jump them, how many
of them have really showed more so far than Nebraska?


Aaron


On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mike Nolan <nolan at tssi.com> wrote:

> > Do you agree with this guy's assessment that Nebraska is a "third tier"
> > team and should be ranked #16?
>
> >
> http://eye-on-collegefootball.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/24156338/32112993
>
> His definition of 'third tier' is kind of weird, but based on how they've
> played and WHO they've played, I think Wisconsin and Nebraska could both
> be a bit overrated.  The challenge is finding schools worthy of being
> rated higher than Nebraska, because quite a few of the top 25 schools
> have played pretty lame schedules so far.
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>