[Husker] Washington

[David Elfering]

I saw some things that made me wince but also some awesome signs. The
pressure form the front four was inconsistent and I thought the
linebackers didn't fill the gaps. Seeing the fullback breaking runs
was a thing of beauty. More importantly it shows the classic multi
dimensional option offense.

The team is showing a dynamic capability to make breath taking plays,
but shoot themselves in the foot with inconsistency.

Tis is going to be really interesting to watch and I love the Big 10
coverage. It makes it easier to gauge the teams development.

David Elfering

On Sep 18, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Nick Chevance <nickchevance at gmail.com> wrote:

> Where is everyone?  The only thing I've seen since the end of the game is
> some mild concerns about the defense, and whether the N in the field turf
> was red enough.  Really?
>
> Somebody not notice the rushing game?  That we ran three backs out of the
> backfield, and for lots of yardage?  That Rex had 120 yards rushing?  Green
> and Heard looked really good?  That the O line that had trouble opening the
> door to the fridge two weeks ago, opened real holes in a decent defensive
> front?  That Martinez got the message, and after the first quarter, slid
> down rather than take punishment?  Nobody noticed the fullback draw?????
>
> Hello?  tink-tink-tink I'm knocking on the screen but I don't see anything.
> Everyone must have taken the weekend off.  To me, the offense looked like
> what I had been led to believe they'd looked like.  I'm extremely pleased.
> Bo sounded that way too.  All is good, right?
>
> Nick
> --
> "If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
> Anatole France
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker