[Husker] Dirk Chatelain apologizes, sort of

[Aaron Wolfson]

>
> I don't think it was much of an apology. He didn't apologize for giving
> Pelini and Martinez and ultimatum to name somebody else the starting
> quarterback, even though there are no challengers to Martinez's starting
> position. All he apologized was for is criticizing Martinez for some off the
> field stuff.


Isn't that what he should be apologizing for, if anything? I don't care much
for Dirk, but why does he need to apologize for simply being wrong?
Columnists are wrong all the time. That said, it seems we all agree that
there's not much value in this column, except for Dirk to save face with his
more gullible readers.


Aaron


On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Reichenbach <reich at inetnebr.com>
> To: george.rapp at gmail.com; husker at tssi.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 2:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Dirk Chatelain apologizes, sort of
>
> >
> http://www.omaha.com/article/20111012/BIGRED/710129793/1001#chatelain-revisiting-critiques-of-quarterback-martinez
>
> I'd say it was an apology, not sort of, although he did try to mitigate
> with context.  Saying you did wrong is seldome easy, especially in such
> a public way.  I don't read his columns, but that one seemed well done.
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>