[Husker] OU-A&M to SEC?

Skylar Dodds sklarbodds at cox.net
Wed Jul 20 16:30:43 CDT 2011


It's just a matter of time.  Osborne saw this coming and made the first move
to make sure Nebraska was taken care of.  Media/Sports people in KC and
Texas villainized Nebraska for its move and more than likely will after the
conference is dead.  Whereas if they look at this objectively they'll
realize that they saw what aTm and OU are seeing right now, that UT's
refusal to give up some of the rights to the Longhorn Network was/is NOT
good for the league.

Nebraska just saw it first, so they're being played as the villain.

On a related note, the B1G payouts are getting bigger...
http://my.journalstar.com/post/Husker_Extra_Group/Husker_Extra/blog/btns_val
ue_to_league_members_rising.html

The article says around $22.9 mil per team vs in the Big XII it's around $12
mil per team.  (Although Nebraska was larger than the $12 mil).

We made the right move and at the PERFECT time.  Kudos to TO and HP.

--
Skylar


-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Dick Karre
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 4:13 PM
To: Husker List
Subject: [Husker] OU-A&M to SEC?

The Sporting News reports that OU and A&M are talking to the SEC. They 
apparently are concerned about the broadcast of high school games on 
UT's network.
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2011-07-20/oklahoma-texas-am
-may-look-at-moving-to-sec-because-of-texas-tv-network

-- 
Dick Karre
dkarre at comcast.net


_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker



More information about the husker mailing list