[Husker] New Defensive Scheme (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Andy Knipp]

No question things will be different. NU has gotten lucky that, even so they
lost do many safeties off  the depth chart, that should not be an issue. As
Mike pointed out, we will see a lot more typical 4/3 defenses played rather
than the Peso or dime packages. I am not too concerned about the DL as they
still saw some pretty good OL players in the B12, the main difference is
that they will see FB and TE followed by powerful backs,



-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Baker, Glenn R LTC MIL USA TRADOC
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:17 AM
To: husker at tssi.com
Subject: [Husker] New Defensive Scheme (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO


All,
I was talking to my brother last night about the Huskers and he made a
very salient point about our defense. He is worried about the defensive
side of the ball due to defending different schemes. The defense of the
past was geared to stop the spread offense and now most of the Big 10
teams offense (except Michigan) use a power I combination. What do you
folks think? Will our front four be stout enough to handle Wisconsin's
running game?

V/R

LTC Glenn R. Baker
National Simulation Center
LESD Exercise Analyst
410 Kearney Avenue- Building 45
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027
phone- 913-684-8185
fax- 913-684-8171
e-mail- glenn.baker at conus.army.mil




Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO


_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker