[Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?

[Tony lambert]

I was watching ESPN today and Robert Smith brought up the fact that the FBI would thorough and that is why nothing has been said or done.

Tony Lambert
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Scott Stewart 
  To: Tony lambert 
  Cc: Don Rietsch ; "Husker List" 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:37 PM
  Subject: Re: [Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?


  Yes, I don't know that they are still involved. They came in early when Cam's father was denying the allegations. They were investigating extortion and the "agent" that was representing Cam. Also the agent was under investigation my the Mississippi law enforcement because they have laws down here regarding paying athletes. 


  I think these things were dropped when the Cam's father admitted the contact. Then the NCAA swept it under the rug...for now. They could not find any money that changed hands, or that Auburn had any knowledge of the things that transpired in Mississippi. 


  They reinstated Cam for the SEC Champ and NCAA Champ, but stated the situation was still under investigation and reserved the right to bring further sanctions against him and Auburn if anything came to light.


  The interesting thing is that Cecil Newton's Church received a large "donation" to refurbish his church around this time. Auburn has a booster (Bobby Lowder). He is on the Auburn Board and has been involved in several escapades (Including the dismissal of Tommy Tubberville and Terry Bowden)


  Scott


  On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net> wrote:

    Didn't I hear that the FBI is now involved.

    Tony Lambert
    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Stewart" <fourtwophd at gmail.com>
    To: "Don Rietsch" <drr at livgenmi.com>
    Cc: ""Husker List"" <husker at tssi.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:14 PM

    Subject: Re: [Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?



      Come on Don, get the facts straight. :)

      His Dad asked $180-200k depending on the report. Also you missed the whole
      reason he was dismissed from the University of Florida program, receiving
      stolen property. Tossed a stolen laptop out his dorm room window when the
      po-po came to visit.

      I expect we will hear more about this now that the season is over. My take
      was the NCAA didn't want to respond too quickly and would rather pull a
      Reggie Bush and go in after the fact. There are coaches at Miss State that
      said he knew of the money and spoke of it in a conversation.

      Like I said, Auburn Football...The Best Team Money Can Buy. What is really
      amazing to me is that they were able to win a National Championship with
      Gene Chizik (Iowa State).

      Scott

      On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Don Rietsch <drr at livgenmi.com> wrote:


        Cam Newton?  You mean the AU QB whose dad shopped him around to the
        colleges
        in exchange for $150K and he didn't know anything about it?  Yup, ol' Dad
        kept that all to himself.  If he kept a secret like that from the son he
        was
        peddling, he needs to give up his Parish and work for the CIA.  I was
        rooting harder for Oregon than I did for the Huskers.  I suspect there is
        allot more of this selling of top recruits going around than we know about.
        Reggie Bush, Cam Newton, who's next.  Maybe Wiki leaks can unravel this
        whole mess.
        Drietsch70

        -----Original Message-----
        From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
        Of
        Rod Wellman
        Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:40 PM
        To: "Husker List"
        Subject: Re: [Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?

        Maybe the "dog" of the game last night was Cam Newton.  Granted, he's
        dynamic and made some plays.  But he flat out missed at least 2 TD passes
        (and maybe more...I wasn't watching that closely).  He makes those and this
        game isn't even close.

        Rod W.
        Sioux City, Ia.

        On Jan 11, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Nick Chevance wrote:

        > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mike Nolan <nolan at romaine.tssi.com>
        wrote:
        >> A field goal kicker may have won the game, but the Auburn defense was
        the
        real
        >> winner last night IMHO.
        >> --
        >> Mike Nolan
        >
        > You know, I don't want to really argue this point, because its
        > basically pointless, but I looked at the score with about a minute to
        > play last night, and Auburn had exactly 19 points.  Oddly, so did
        > Oregon.  So, if the Auburn's defense was the star, was Oregon favored
        > to run up the score?  No, actually, they were the dogs in this contest
        > and had been all week.  Nobody thought they'd win it, so unless Auburn
        > outscores them, it doesn't happen.  I guess I'm confused.  While
        > Auburn's defense played very well, I'm not sure I'm awarding them any
        > prizes, at least not as many as maybe Oregon handed them last night.
        >
        > I thought the "goat" of the game, if there is one, is the Oregon QB
        > who either badly misread several read options, or didn't bother to
        > read the option at all and predetermined what he was doing with the
        > ball.  And after watching that, and thinking back to some of our games
        > this year, it began to look strangely similar.  So, in the second half
        > of the season, did Martinez, who really handles the ball very well in
        > the read option, simply call his own number too many times?  Or were
        > the reads correct and we just got stuffed.
        >
        > Is there really a read in the read option?  Or is it the flip of a
        > coin - heads I run, tails you run.
        >
        > Nick
        > --
        > "For every person with a spark of genius, there are hundreds with an
        > ignition problem"
        >          Coffee News(6/9/10)
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > husker site list
        > husker at tssi.com
        > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

        _______________________________________________
        husker site list
        husker at tssi.com
        http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

        __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
        database 5779 (20110111) __________

        The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

        http://www.eset.com



        _______________________________________________
        husker site list
        husker at tssi.com
        http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker


      _______________________________________________
      husker site list
      husker at tssi.com
      http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker