[Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?
Scott Stewart
fourtwophd at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 19:14:58 CST 2011
Come on Don, get the facts straight. :)
His Dad asked $180-200k depending on the report. Also you missed the whole
reason he was dismissed from the University of Florida program, receiving
stolen property. Tossed a stolen laptop out his dorm room window when the
po-po came to visit.
I expect we will hear more about this now that the season is over. My take
was the NCAA didn't want to respond too quickly and would rather pull a
Reggie Bush and go in after the fact. There are coaches at Miss State that
said he knew of the money and spoke of it in a conversation.
Like I said, Auburn Football...The Best Team Money Can Buy. What is really
amazing to me is that they were able to win a National Championship with
Gene Chizik (Iowa State).
Scott
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Don Rietsch <drr at livgenmi.com> wrote:
> Cam Newton? You mean the AU QB whose dad shopped him around to the
> colleges
> in exchange for $150K and he didn't know anything about it? Yup, ol' Dad
> kept that all to himself. If he kept a secret like that from the son he
> was
> peddling, he needs to give up his Parish and work for the CIA. I was
> rooting harder for Oregon than I did for the Huskers. I suspect there is
> allot more of this selling of top recruits going around than we know about.
> Reggie Bush, Cam Newton, who's next. Maybe Wiki leaks can unravel this
> whole mess.
> Drietsch70
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Rod Wellman
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:40 PM
> To: "Husker List"
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?
>
> Maybe the "dog" of the game last night was Cam Newton. Granted, he's
> dynamic and made some plays. But he flat out missed at least 2 TD passes
> (and maybe more...I wasn't watching that closely). He makes those and this
> game isn't even close.
>
> Rod W.
> Sioux City, Ia.
>
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Nick Chevance wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mike Nolan <nolan at romaine.tssi.com>
> wrote:
> >> A field goal kicker may have won the game, but the Auburn defense was
> the
> real
> >> winner last night IMHO.
> >> --
> >> Mike Nolan
> >
> > You know, I don't want to really argue this point, because its
> > basically pointless, but I looked at the score with about a minute to
> > play last night, and Auburn had exactly 19 points. Oddly, so did
> > Oregon. So, if the Auburn's defense was the star, was Oregon favored
> > to run up the score? No, actually, they were the dogs in this contest
> > and had been all week. Nobody thought they'd win it, so unless Auburn
> > outscores them, it doesn't happen. I guess I'm confused. While
> > Auburn's defense played very well, I'm not sure I'm awarding them any
> > prizes, at least not as many as maybe Oregon handed them last night.
> >
> > I thought the "goat" of the game, if there is one, is the Oregon QB
> > who either badly misread several read options, or didn't bother to
> > read the option at all and predetermined what he was doing with the
> > ball. And after watching that, and thinking back to some of our games
> > this year, it began to look strangely similar. So, in the second half
> > of the season, did Martinez, who really handles the ball very well in
> > the read option, simply call his own number too many times? Or were
> > the reads correct and we just got stuffed.
> >
> > Is there really a read in the read option? Or is it the flip of a
> > coin - heads I run, tails you run.
> >
> > Nick
> > --
> > "For every person with a spark of genius, there are hundreds with an
> > ignition problem"
> > Coffee News(6/9/10)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
> database 5779 (20110111) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
More information about the husker
mailing list