[Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?

[Don Rietsch]

Cam Newton?  You mean the AU QB whose dad shopped him around to the colleges
in exchange for $150K and he didn't know anything about it?  Yup, ol' Dad
kept that all to himself.  If he kept a secret like that from the son he was
peddling, he needs to give up his Parish and work for the CIA.  I was
rooting harder for Oregon than I did for the Huskers.  I suspect there is
allot more of this selling of top recruits going around than we know about.
Reggie Bush, Cam Newton, who's next.  Maybe Wiki leaks can unravel this
whole mess.
Drietsch70

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
Rod Wellman
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:40 PM
To: "Husker List"
Subject: Re: [Husker] Would you want Oregon's offense?

Maybe the "dog" of the game last night was Cam Newton.  Granted, he's
dynamic and made some plays.  But he flat out missed at least 2 TD passes
(and maybe more...I wasn't watching that closely).  He makes those and this
game isn't even close.

Rod W.
Sioux City, Ia.

On Jan 11, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Nick Chevance wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mike Nolan <nolan at romaine.tssi.com>
wrote:
>> A field goal kicker may have won the game, but the Auburn defense was the
real
>> winner last night IMHO.
>> --
>> Mike Nolan
> 
> You know, I don't want to really argue this point, because its
> basically pointless, but I looked at the score with about a minute to
> play last night, and Auburn had exactly 19 points.  Oddly, so did
> Oregon.  So, if the Auburn's defense was the star, was Oregon favored
> to run up the score?  No, actually, they were the dogs in this contest
> and had been all week.  Nobody thought they'd win it, so unless Auburn
> outscores them, it doesn't happen.  I guess I'm confused.  While
> Auburn's defense played very well, I'm not sure I'm awarding them any
> prizes, at least not as many as maybe Oregon handed them last night.
> 
> I thought the "goat" of the game, if there is one, is the Oregon QB
> who either badly misread several read options, or didn't bother to
> read the option at all and predetermined what he was doing with the
> ball.  And after watching that, and thinking back to some of our games
> this year, it began to look strangely similar.  So, in the second half
> of the season, did Martinez, who really handles the ball very well in
> the read option, simply call his own number too many times?  Or were
> the reads correct and we just got stuffed.
> 
> Is there really a read in the read option?  Or is it the flip of a
> coin - heads I run, tails you run.
> 
> Nick
> -- 
> "For every person with a spark of genius, there are hundreds with an
> ignition problem"
>          Coffee News(6/9/10)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5779 (20110111) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com