[Husker] just a thought

[Mike Jaixen]

Judging from the number of teams that have looked to jump into BCS conferences as of late, I don't think this will have much of an impact.

But there always be a need for non-BCS conference opponents, as most major schools need the extra home game revenue. What will be tougher is that the mid-majors that have had success obtaining 2-for-1 deals with BCS teams may not be able to do that down the line.  The Nebraskas of college football will play you, but won't be able to play in Laramie, Hattiesburg, or Fresno anymore.

 
Mike Jaixen
http://huskermike.blogspot.com
http://www.cornnation.com


________________________________
 From: "gscratch1 at comcast.net" <gscratch1 at comcast.net>
To: list husker <husker at tssi.com> 
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:35 PM
Subject: [Husker] just a thought
 


>I'd even be in favor of having one fewer B1G game if it would be possible 
>to do the same with the SEC and/or Big 12.  How great would that be for 
>college football? 


If all the "major" (ie, automatic BCS) conferences engaged agreements like this (ie, with the other automatic-BCS conferences , would that just make being a member of a non-BCS conference that much less attractive?  meaning, less opportunity for a Wyoming to play a Nebraska, since there wouldn't be any space on the schedule. 

Or, how soon until we have another 'tier' of teams? 



Glen in IL 

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker