[Husker] McKewon on Caputo

Wed Dec 21 17:01:45 CST 2011

There is what you blow into the machine and then there is what your blood alcohol level test out to be. They are usually very close but not exactly the same if done at the same time. 

I'm not sure, but I think the blowing into the tube gets you hauled in, but it's the results of the blood test (which takes a few days) that gets you charged. There is some lag time between blowing and the blood draw. Just speculating that the time difference could be enough to get under the limit or down to the margin of error for the blood test. 

I don't know, just speculating...

---- Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com> wrote: 
> I recall he tested at .10x on the blood alcohol test...so from a motor vehicle perspective, he was intoxicated.

Mike Jaixen
http://huskermike.blogspot.com
http://www.cornnation.com

________________________________
 From: Steve Kauf <kaufsss at aol.com>
To: gobigredlist at gmail.com; aj05810 at windstream.net 
Cc: husker at tssi.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo

Is it possible he wasn't intoxicated?  Pelini said he was waiting for 'all the info' to come out and then he would decide.  Did we ever hear he was certainly drunk ?  

Steve Kauf 
A Husker fan deep in SEC Country - Northwest Louisiana 

Not the Victory but the Action 
Not the Goal but the Game 
In the Deed the Glory

-----Original Message-----
From: David Strong <gobigredlist at gmail.com>
To: aj05810 <aj05810 at windstream.net>
Cc: husker <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Wed, Dec 21, 2011 3:04 pm
Subject: Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo

So if there was no "active" driving going on, how is it that he is charged
ith "reckless driving"?  How would reckless driving be easier to prove
hat pulling a guy who was drunk out from behind the wheel of a stopped car
nd taking him to detox?
This exact situation gets charged and convicted all the time.  The response
bout the good lawyer is probably much more accurate.
Dave
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:34 PM, <aj05810 at windstream.net> wrote:
> It's a safe bet that the car/truck didn't start or drive itself to where
he was found.

That said, because he wasn't driving, the DUI is hard to prove. They don't
know how long he had been there, so his blood alcohol content at the time
he was actually driving would be hard to prove. A good lawyer would argue
that. Reckless driving would be an easier charge to prove and one I'm sure
would be agreed to instead of a DUI.

I had a friend that had the same thing happen, snockered, but not actively
operating the car when the cop found him. They couldn't arrest him for DUI
as there was no active "driving" going on.

---- Andy Knipp <andy at knipp.com> wrote:
> So if he was parked and sleeping (albeit in a running vehicle),  how can
he
> get reckless driving ?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On
Behalf Of
> Skylar Dodds
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: 'Mike Jaixen'; 'David Strong'; husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo
>
> Here's a shorter URL so it doesn't wrap:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/7kg7bwb
>
> --
> Skylar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On
Behalf Of
> Skylar Dodds
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:35 PM
> To: 'Mike Jaixen'; 'David Strong'; husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo
>
> Looks like Caputo's charge was reduced to reckless driving.  My guess is
he
> will not sit out at all.
>
>
http://huskerextra.com/sports/football/article_48ea6bee-3ef2-5ff2-9a35-820f4
> 91a4019.html
>
> --
> Skylar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On
Behalf Of
> Mike Jaixen
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 8:58 AM
> To: David Strong; husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo
>
> The assumption was that he would be suspended...and he still could be.
But I
> think Pelini is waiting for more information to be uncovered.
>
> The cynical side of me suggests that Pelini doesn't want to suspend his
most
> experienced center, as Cole Pensick hasn't played much this season.
(That's
> mitigated slightly since Pelini's nephew is the next in line after
Pensick.)
>
> The realist in me suggests that Pelini views this situation differently
> since Caputo wasn't actually driving when he was arrested. Perhaps Caputo
> told Pelini that he didn't realize he was that impaired when he started
to
> drive home, but after he started, he realized he shouldn't be driving,
so he
> pulled over.  The legal system doesn't care about that; he still was in
> control of the vehicle, so he still would be in violation of the law.
That
> detail might mean something to Pelini, and affect his final decision.
>
> I don't presume to speak for Pelini on this, but am only speculating as
to
> why Caputo hasn't been suspended yet.
>
>
> Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
>
>
> ________________________________

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker