[Husker] McKewon on Caputo

[David Strong]

You are absolutely right.  It was Warrick.  Sorry Percy!

Dave

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com>wrote:

> I think you are confusing Harvin for Peter Warrick, Harvin went to Florida
> and played in the late 90's there.
> Scott in NY
>
>  *From:* David Strong <gobigredlist at gmail.com>
> *To:* Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* "husker at tssi.com" <husker at tssi.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 19, 2011 1:59 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo
>
> I can see that.  But I remember back to the Florida State shoplifting
> incident involving Percy Harvin, Lavernious Coles, and I think a few
> others.  I think Bowden either suspended or dismissed Coles, but Harvin
> drew a lesser punishment.  Bowden was very clear that it was because Harvin
> had been an exemplary individual his entire time in the program.  Bowden
> addressed it head on and no one seemed to have a problem with his
> decision.  I remember listening to him explain it and it seemed ok to me.
> But if BP layed down a "zero tolerance" policy, I think you guys are right
> when you feel he should stick to it and has no wiggle room.
>
> Dave
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It shouldn't matter if the player is a starter or has only seen mop-up
> > time in the spring game.  It's a decision based on rules and policies.  I
> > agree...the football effects of the decision are irrelevant.
> >
> >
> > Mike Jaixen
> > http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> > http://www.cornnation.com
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: "Smith, William" <wsmith at towson.edu>
> > To:
> > Cc: "husker at tssi.com" <husker at tssi.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Husker] McKewon on Caputo
> >
> > I would respectfully submit that decisions like these should be made
> based
> > on established team policies and the larger interests of the university
> > and community. The impact on a football game, even a bowl, should have
> > little if any role in the decision.  In that way I would not consider
> > Pellini to be "in a bind".
> >
> > If the evidence points to DWI, this is a no brainer.
> >
> > Bill Smith
> > Towson, MD
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/19/11 11:46 AM, "David Strong" <gobigredlist at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I don't really know much about Caputo except for his play...but let's
> > >assume that, being a senior, he's been in the program a long time and
> has
> > >been a model citizen in every way.  Great player, but also great
> > >team-mate,
> > >great guy, just a good person on your team for all that time.  And now
> his
> > >college experience ends on a downer.  I could see BP maybe looking for
> > >some
> > >way to avoid that.  The problem is that he is, arguably, the most
> crucial
> > >player on the OL and losing him would be a blow.  Puts BP in a bind.  I
> > >feel he probably has to sit him at least a half, and explain clearly
> why.
> > >
> > >Dave
> > >
> > >On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Mike Jaixen <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The assumption was that he would be suspended...and he still could be.
> > >>But
> > >> I think Pelini is waiting for more information to be uncovered.
> > >>
> > >> The cynical side of me suggests that Pelini doesn't want to suspend
> his
> > >> most experienced center, as Cole Pensick hasn't played much this
> season.
> > >> (That's mitigated slightly since Pelini's nephew is the next in line
> > >>after
> > >> Pensick.)
> > >>
> > >> The realist in me suggests that Pelini views this situation
> differently
> > >> since Caputo wasn't actually driving when he was arrested. Perhaps
> > >>Caputo
> > >> told Pelini that he didn't realize he was that impaired when he
> started
> > >>to
> > >> drive home, but after he started, he realized he shouldn't be driving,
> > >>so
> > >> he pulled over.  The legal system doesn't care about that; he still
> was
> > >>in
> > >> control of the vehicle, so he still would be in violation of the law.
> > >>That
> > >> detail might mean something to Pelini, and affect his final decision.
> > >>
> > >> I don't presume to speak for Pelini on this, but am only speculating
> as
> > >>to
> > >> why Caputo hasn't been suspended yet.
> > >>
> > >> Mike Jaixen
> > >> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> > >> http://www.cornnation.com
> > >>  ------------------------------
> > >> *From:* David Strong <gobigredlist at gmail.com>
> > >> *To:* husker at tssi.com
> > >> *Sent:* Monday, December 19, 2011 8:37 AM
> > >> *Subject:* [Husker] McKewon on Caputo
> > >>
> > >> http://www.omaha.com/article/20111218/BIGRED/712189868
> > >>
> > >> I did not realize that Caputo had not been suspended yet.
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> husker site list
> > >> husker at tssi.com
> > >> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >husker site list
> > >husker at tssi.com
> > >http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> >
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
>