[Husker] LSU vs Alabama

[Shawn Sherlock]

I thought that the Nebraska rule was the inclusion of a multiplier added for the conference championships. But AL was still quite a ways a head. 

Also, while yes a loss is a loss I personally do not consider our embarrassing beat down by then #14 CU the same thing as a 9-6 OT loss to the #1 team in the country.   IMO 

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 5, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Steve Cornelius <sscornelius at gmail.com> wrote:

> I thought the same thing that you had to win your conference championship
> in order to be considered for the national title game. Maybe that got
> changed when they changed the weighting of the polls vs. computers.
> 
> --
> Steve Cornelius
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Steve <schuman227 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> So where is the outrage about a team that didn’t win their conference
>> playing for the MNC like there was in 2001 when the same thing happened to
>> Nebraska.
>> 
>> Wasn’t a rule passed (“The Nebraska Rule”) that forbid the current BCS BS
>> Championship scenario?
>> 
>> Just sayin’...
>> 
>> 
>> Steve
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker