[Husker] Could it get worse for UT?
Jon Johnston
jon.johnston at gmail.com
Wed Aug 31 16:15:52 CDT 2011
Agree with Mike. Texas has a conference that they and Oklahoma can completely control (what's that sound coming from Oklahoma during these past two years???? Silence? That's what I thought it was), make more money than most, and still have people want to hang around with them to pick up some scraps.
Jon Johnston
Corn Nation
On Aug 31, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Mike Jaixen wrote:
> Texas is not going anywhere. The LHN deal is too rich financially for them to abandon, and nobody will take them with it. The Pac-12 said no to LHN. Jim Delaney won't consider it. I don't think Mike Slive will go for it either.
>
>
> Mike Jaixen
> http://huskermike.blogspot.com
> http://www.cornnation.com
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net>
> To: husker at tssi.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Could it get worse for UT?
>
> On 8/31/2011 1:27 PM, David Elfering wrote:
>> Actually at this point everyone becomes important. Why not say Missouri or
>> even Iowa State branch out and get a conference offer and then use it to
>> leverage the heck out of Bebee and UT? Any domino that falls now is like a
>> kick in the gut to the B12/10/9.
>>
>
> It's not hard to envision UT, TT, OU and OSU jumping to the Pac 12. Culturally and (except maybe for UT) academically it's a lousy fit, but I suspect Larry Scott could come up with millions of good reasons to do it.
>
> -- Dick Karre
> dkarre at comcast.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list