FW: [Husker] predictions, anyone?

Sat Sep 18 18:06:18 CDT 2010

Because he can't seem to hang on to the ball? :-)
--
Greg Zimmerman, UNL '75
Overland Park, Kansas

---- Lynette Tillner <ltillner at yahoo.com> wrote: 
> Steve, 

The game is still being played.... 9 minutes left in the 2nd half. I can't 
understand why Green isn't in on Mop up!
 Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
ltillner at yahoo.com 

________________________________
From: SteveG <stevegomez6571 at gmail.com>
To: Huskerz <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sat, September 18, 2010 2:57:55 PM
Subject: RE: FW: [Husker] predictions, anyone?

The mirror reflections are now clear...

(1) TM's athletic ability is greater than his in-experience.  Great effort
and not too many errors on his part.

(2) Except for putting Green in, Pelini has the team ready, willing and
able.  The Blackshirts were well-prepared to contain.

(3) I mis-typed in my earlier post...I meant CFL.

A great win for the Huskers...and I am relieved that I was all wrong.

Steve G

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Chevance [mailto:nickchevance at gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 4:24 PM
To: SteveG
Cc: Huskerz
Subject: Re: FW: [Husker] predictions, anyone?

So far, at halftime, Nebraska 28, Washington 14

We've seen one impressive drive by Washington, all on the ground, no passes.
We've seen a Nebraska turnover give them a first down on the 6, resulting in
a TD.  Otherwise, their 1st round NFL draft QB is about 2 for 12 with a pick
in the first half.  He literally has no one to throw to because the
Blackshirts have pretty much cut off the passing routes.

Nebraska on offense looked unbelievable on the two short drives for scores.
Then they sort of went into a funk, it looked like they wanted to throw it
too much, and as soon as they decided to run it again, two scores and a
certain amount of control.

I predict a couple of more scores for us, maybe slight chance of one for
Washington in the second half.  Its over, put a fork in it.

Oooops, an 80 run by Martinez.  Maybe three or more scores in the second
half.  My bad.

Nick

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:24 AM, SteveG <stevegomez6571 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fellow Husker Listers:
>
> OK... Here is why I predict a close game today.
>
> (1) TM's Experience
>
> I've watched both of the games on DVD and feel like the TM is *NOT* 
> ready for the mental aspect of a hostile environment.  I see some 
> things in his mannerisms that lead me to believe that he will make too 
> many mistakes...heck the kid just turned 20 and I sure hope that he 
> didn't party too much this week!   TM does have amazing athletic 
> ability and one or two broken plays might balance out the mistakes in 
> this game.  I hope that I am wrong about the mistakes.
>
> (2) Coaching
>
> The fact that Sarkisian and Holt were Offensive and Defensive 
> coordinators at USC when they handed the Big Red back2back azz-kickins 
> does also play a role in my prediction.  Granted they don't have the 
> same talent pool in Seattle...but the cupboards are not bare either.  
> Again, this argument can be watered down when you consider that the 
> games were played while Callahan and Cosgrove were guiding the ship.
>
> (3) The Cannon
>
> This guy is going to be playing in the NFL 12 months from now. His 
> quick release and ability to scramble [avoid sacks] poses a challenge 
> to the Blackshirts aggressive style.  There has to be a defensive 
> scheme to respect the cannon...and I am glad we have the Pelinis in 
> charge of making the calls. But how do you contain The Cannon AND the 
> RB, Polk???  Today we find out if the Blackshirts really are better than
last year's squad.
>
> BTW, we get the mirror image of the game so I'll try to post some more 
> reflections later tonight or tomorrow.
>
> Go Big Red!
>
> Steve Gomez
> Loves Park, IL
> (deep behind enemy lines in big TelEveN country)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SteveG
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:04 PM
> To: 'husker at tssi.com'
> Subject: RE: [Husker] predictions, anyone?
>
> 16-18 uDub wins a close one.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On 
> Behalf Of Skylar Dodds
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 7:08 PM
> To: Lawson, Scott R.; 'Aaron Wolfson'; Tony lambert
> Cc: Joe Janecek; husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] predictions, anyone?
>
> I'll take 31-17 good guys.
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Lawson, Scott R." <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
> Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 3:46 pm
> Subject: [Husker] predictions, anyone?
> To: "'Aaron Wolfson'" <awolfson0 at gmail.com>, "Tony lambert"
> <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>
> Cc: "Joe Janecek" <joejanecek at yahoo.com>, "husker at tssi.com"
> <husker at tssi.com>
>
>
> 24-17 NU
>
> Scott in NY
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On 
> Behalf Of Aaron Wolfson
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:42 PM
> To: Tony lambert
> Cc: Joe Janecek; husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] predictions, anyone?
>
> NU 37, UW 7
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Tony lambert
<slimmer37 at hamilton.net>wrote:
>
>> I see it 31-10 HUSKERS
>>
>> Tony Lambert
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Janecek"
>> <joejanecek at yahoo.com>
>> To: <husker at tssi.com>
>> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 2:37 PM
>> Subject: [Husker] predictions, anyone?
>>
>>
>>
>>  >From what I've read, it seems a lot of sportswriters think this 
>> will be a
>>> >close game.
>>>
>>> I don't. NU 31, uDub 13.
>>>
>>> joebigred
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> husker site list
>>> husker at tssi.com
>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>

--
“It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be
unhappy.”
          Groucho Marx

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker