[Husker] Offense
Lynette Tillner
ltillner at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 5 16:24:26 CDT 2010
I wondered about that as well but am definately not the brains behind College
Football :-)
Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
ltillner at yahoo.com
________________________________
From: Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>
To: Lynette Tillner <ltillner at yahoo.com>; Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com>;
Mark Landin <marklandin at gmail.com>
Cc: Husker List <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sun, September 5, 2010 2:20:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
I understand that, I read that article. but why does Whaley have to the one to
call the checks, why not a DB or the other LB. or is the Defense set up that
only one position can call the checks.
Tony Lambert
----- Original Message -----
>From: Lynette Tillner
>To: Tony lambert ; Aaron Wolfson ; Mark Landin
>Cc: Husker List
>Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 4:09 PM
>Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
>
>
>Here's the article. I read it as the players switching positions was not an
>option. I could definately be wrong.
>
>
>http://huskerextra.com/sports/football/article_7ad6173a-b8a0-11df-975d-001cc4c03286.html
>
>
>The paragraph I'm referring to says: "In Nebraska' new 4-2-5 defense, which uses
>a hybrid linebacker/safety position, the two main linebacker spots are not
>interchangeable. Whaley was next on the depth chart at Compton's spot."
>
>
>Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
>ltillner at yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>
>To: Lynette Tillner <ltillner at yahoo.com>; Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com>;
>Mark Landin <marklandin at gmail.com>
>Cc: Husker List <husker at tssi.com>
>Sent: Sun, September 5, 2010 1:25:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
>
>
>So switch the two players. If David is a quick learner make him the one who
>calls the plays. Just asking.
>
>Tony Lambert
>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Lynette Tillner
>>To: Tony lambert ; Aaron Wolfson ; Mark Landin
>>Cc: Husker List
>>Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 3:20 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
>>
>>
>>The LJS article I read said the positions were not interchangable.
>> Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
>>ltillner at yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
________________________________
From: Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>
>>To: Aaron Wolfson <awolfson0 at gmail.com>; Mark Landin <marklandin at gmail.com>
>>Cc: Husker List <husker at tssi.com>
>>Sent: Sun, September 5, 2010 1:01:28 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
>>
>>Would the Pelinis change David and Whaley around so that David can make the
>>defensive calls ?
>>
>>Tony Lambert
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Aaron Wolfson
>> To: Mark Landin
>> Cc: Tony lambert ; Borer Steve CAA ; Husker List
>> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 1:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
>>
>>
>> I've re-watched about half the game, and I did notice that while David was
>>amazing against the run, he did make several errors against pass coverage.
>>Probably to be expected in his first start, and it sounds like he is a fast
>>learner.
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Mark Landin <marklandin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> True, but do you think the Pelinis are going to accept that? Perhaps
>> the team is looking for some leadership to generate that intensity in
>> the 4th quarter of comfortable games.
>>
>> On the post-game, bo was asked about David's play and he said "He made
>> a lot of mistakes". I get the impression it's going to be some tough
>> pactices for the D this week, regardless of the 39-point margin.
>>
>>
>> On 9/5/10, Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net> wrote:
>> > The article that Dick referenced explains why WKU got its long run in
the
>> > second half, and isn't human nature not to stay as focused as one should
>> > when you have the game in hand ?
>> >
>> > Tony Lambert
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Borer Steve CAA" <steve.borer at connectseward.org>
>> > To: "Mark Landin" <marklandin at gmail.com>
>> > Cc: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
>> > Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 11:55 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [Husker] Offense
>> >
>> >
>> >> I'm also guessing the defensive game plan may have also gotten a bit
>>more
>> >>
>> >> "vanilla" in terms of scheme/blitz, etc., in the second half. Why show
>> >> more than you need to? Nonetheless, I am sure Carl and Bo will find
>> >> plenty to motivate the team towards improvement!
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >>
>> >> Steve Borer, CMAA
>> >> Asst. Prin/AD
>> >> Seward HS
>> >> 532 Northern Heights
>> >> Seward, NE 68434
>> >> (402) 643-2988 (Office)
>> >> (402) 643-2599 (Fax)
>> >> (402) 649-4368 (Cell)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sep 5, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Mark Landin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> There's no substitute for game action, and that was the first for
>> >>> backer David, and Whaley has not seen the field much either. Mistakes
>> >>> were inevitable, as is improvement (I hope!)
>> >>>
>> >>> Our pass rush was ferocious in the first half, and missing in the 2nd.
>> >>> Was it intensity? Meredith gone? WKU adjustments?
>> >>>
>> >>> On 9/4/10, Lynette Tillner <ltillner at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>>> Didn't those injuries just happen in the last few days? If so, I
>would
>> >>>> say
>> >>>> the coaches haven't had enough time to make needed adjustments. If
>>not,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> we
>> >>>> have
>> >>>> a problem....
>> >>>> Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
>> >>>> ltillner at yahoo.com
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ________________________________
>> >>>> From: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net>
>> >>>> To: Husker List <husker at tssi.com>
>> >>>> Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 8:21:42 PM
>> >>>> Subject: [Husker] Offense
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nebraska's seven touchdown drives covered 388 yards in 32 plays - a
>>bit
>> >>>>
>> >>>> over
>> >>>> 12
>> >>>> per play. Overall, the Huskers ran 58 plays for 536 yards - just over
>>9
>> >>>>
>> >>>> per
>> >>>> play. Notwithstanding it was against a subpar defense, that's pretty
>> >>>> efficient.
>> >>>> Martinez ran seven times for 126 yards and completed 9 of 15 for
136:
>> >>>> 22
>> >>>> plays
>> >>>> for 262 yards and 3 TDs. I'm guessing he won't be moving to safety
>> >>>> anytime
>> >>>> soon.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As for the defense, I think the injuries to Fisher and Comption are
a
>> >>>> real
>> >>>> problem. Let's hope the coaches can get that thing fixed. Not what
>> >>>> we're
>> >>>> used
>> >>>> to.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- Dick Karre
>> >>>> dkarre at comcast.net
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> husker site list
>> >>>> husker at tssi.com
>> >>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> husker site list
>> >>>> husker at tssi.com
>> >>>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Sent from my mobile device
>> >>>
>> >>> "He's old enough to know what's right and young enough not to choose
>> >>> it. He's strong enough to win the world and weak enough to lose it." -
>> >>> Neal Peart
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> husker site list
>> >>> husker at tssi.com
>> >>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> husker site list
>> >> husker at tssi.com
>> >> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device
>>
>> "He's old enough to know what's right and young enough not to choose
>> it. He's strong enough to win the world and weak enough to lose it." -
>> Neal Peart
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>husker site list
>>husker at tssi.com
>>http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
>>
>
More information about the husker
mailing list