[Husker] Re: Polls
Steve Reichenbach
reich at inetnebr.com
Sun Oct 31 15:23:25 CDT 2010
Sagarin has NU #5, so I think the BCS computers will treat NU well.
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net> wrote:
> > I would think today sometime but I'm not sure. I thought Nebraska might be a
> > bit higher say around 7th, being in the top 10 is fine.
> > Tony Lambert
>
> Well, considering we beat the #6 team in the country, I could make the
> argument that we deserve to move up more than we did, but then we all
> know that Missouri wasn't a solid #6, and maybe a pretender to a top
> ten team. Not that beating them is any less important, but taking the
> Oklahoma game out of their stats, I wasn't terribly worried.
>
> I thought we did well last year, in the rain, to control him. This
> year, if we had sprained his ankle like we did last year, I don't
> think they would have scored 17. Our defense was geared toward what
> they ran at us. His running did the most damage to us. Sometimes
> three down linemen, sometimes four, and 7 or 8 in coverage. An
> occasional blitz, just to keep him unsettled back there. And that
> line push, especially in the first half, was the finest defensive line
> play I've seen from this team all year. Gabbert wasn't able, for much
> of the game, to sit back and pick out his second and third receivers;
> he was often running and throwing. He was most successful in the
> third quarter when we weren't getting as good a push up the middle and
> we weren't sending a 4th or 5th guy after him.
>
> I'm quite happy with a #9/#10. I'll be interested to see the BCS, cuz
> they really loved Missouri. That's gotta help us, unless the BCS
> support for Missouri was a bit ephemeral too.
More information about the husker
mailing list