[Husker] Game worries
Lynette Tillner
ltillner at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 12 21:58:23 CDT 2010
I'm not sure Top 5 FB teams reach Six Sigma, (99.997%) Three Sigma or Four
maybe....
Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
ltillner at yahoo.com
________________________________
From: Paul Dalen <quesohusker at gmail.com>
To: "<dmennenga at kc.rr.com>" <dmennenga at kc.rr.com>
Cc: Husker List <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Tue, October 12, 2010 7:40:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] Game worries
True. But upsets are rare. The better team rarely loses, especially at
home. I wish I had time to do the research on this, but I'll bet that
when a top five team plays an unranked team at home, the ranked team
wins in at least 95% of the games, maybe close to 99%.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:18 PM, <dmennenga at kc.rr.com> wrote:
> You've conveniently forgotten that Nebraska was favored by at least three
>touchdowns over the Longhorns in the 1996 Big XII Championship game... I had
>the opportunity to watch that debacle in St. Louis in person.
>
> Or were you looking for reasons NOT to worry about next week's game??
>
>
> ---- Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I've seen the spreads posted for this game and the early line is Nebraska
>>giving 10 points on some sites. I do not remember Nebraska ever being favored by
>>10 against the Horns, but I could be wrong. I realize the line is for betting
>>reasons, but 10 is still pretty high.
>>
>> I am not as worried as I was three weeks ago.
>>
>> Scott in NY
>> (horns DOWN)
>>
>> --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Andrew Smith <arossman at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: Andrew Smith <arossman at earthlink.net>
>> Subject: [Husker] Game worries
>> To: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
>> Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 9:56 PM
>>
>> While there are many reasons to optimistic about the game against Texas (see
>>the below)
>>
>> ---- Sagarin ----- ----------------------- NCAA Stats
>>-----------------------
>> Sched Rank Rating Pass Off Rush Off Scor Off Pass Def Rush
>>Def Scor Def
>> Nebraska 76 86.01 106 2 9 1 57
>>4
>> Texas 32 71.70 53 82 80 8 19
>> 36
>>
>> there are reasons not to be over confident.
>>
>> Nebraska's schedule rank is 76 vs Texas' 32. Therefore the dominating
>>offensive/defensive rankings are misleading.
>>
>> Nebraska's 57th ranked rushing defense is very worrisome.
>>
>> Texas' rushing defense is even better than #19 if you look at average
>>yards/rush. I will not be surprised if Texas is able to force Nebraska to pass.
>>I believe that when a top offense meets a top defense, the defense usually wins
>>and the offense makes mistakes since it's hard for offenses to be patient. Add
>>in a freshman QB and patience may be even more of an issue. With a #106 passing
>>offense against a #8 pass defense, too many interceptions by Martinez are quite
>>possible.
>>
>> Nebraska performance against South Dakota State shows they are capable of
>>playing well below their potential. SDS is a bad (1-4) AA team and the closer
>>than expected game cannot be written off to turnovers (Nebraska had only 1 more
>>than SDS). Texas' worst performance was against UCLA and turnovers (3 more than
>>UCLA) was a big factor. IMHO, Nebraska's worst performance is well below
>>Texas'.
>>
>> Texas' seems to save its best for Nebraska, often upsetting the Huskers when
>>the underdog.
>>
>> I hope all of my concerns are proven wrong.
>>
>> GO BIG RED!
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list