[Husker] Game worries
dmennenga at kc.rr.com
dmennenga at kc.rr.com
Sun Oct 10 23:17:58 CDT 2010
You've conveniently forgotten that Nebraska was favored by at least three touchdowns over the Longhorns in the 1996 Big XII Championship game... I had the opportunity to watch that debacle in St. Louis in person.
Or were you looking for reasons NOT to worry about next week's game??
---- Scott Lawson <scott71lawson at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've seen the spreads posted for this game and the early line is Nebraska giving 10 points on some sites. I do not remember Nebraska ever being favored by 10 against the Horns, but I could be wrong. I realize the line is for betting reasons, but 10 is still pretty high.
>
> I am not as worried as I was three weeks ago.
>
> Scott in NY
> (horns DOWN)
>
> --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Andrew Smith <arossman at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Smith <arossman at earthlink.net>
> Subject: [Husker] Game worries
> To: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 9:56 PM
>
> While there are many reasons to optimistic about the game against Texas (see the below)
>
> ---- Sagarin ----- ----------------------- NCAA Stats -----------------------
> Sched Rank Rating Pass Off Rush Off Scor Off Pass Def Rush Def Scor Def
> Nebraska 76 86.01 106 2 9 1 57 4
> Texas 32 71.70 53 82 80 8 19 36
>
> there are reasons not to be over confident.
>
> Nebraska's schedule rank is 76 vs Texas' 32. Therefore the dominating offensive/defensive rankings are misleading.
>
> Nebraska's 57th ranked rushing defense is very worrisome.
>
> Texas' rushing defense is even better than #19 if you look at average yards/rush. I will not be surprised if Texas is able to force Nebraska to pass. I believe that when a top offense meets a top defense, the defense usually wins and the offense makes mistakes since it's hard for offenses to be patient. Add in a freshman QB and patience may be even more of an issue. With a #106 passing offense against a #8 pass defense, too many interceptions by Martinez are quite possible.
>
> Nebraska performance against South Dakota State shows they are capable of playing well below their potential. SDS is a bad (1-4) AA team and the closer than expected game cannot be written off to turnovers (Nebraska had only 1 more than SDS). Texas' worst performance was against UCLA and turnovers (3 more than UCLA) was a big factor. IMHO, Nebraska's worst performance is well below Texas'.
>
> Texas' seems to save its best for Nebraska, often upsetting the Huskers when the underdog.
>
> I hope all of my concerns are proven wrong.
>
> GO BIG RED!
> Andy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list