[Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)

[fourbox at nctc.net]

Keep calling them the way you are Skylar! I agree with you! We will be in position to say "I told you so!"

Bob in the sandhills  
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel

-----Original Message-----
From: "Skylar Dodds" <sklarbodds at cox.net>
Sender: husker-bounces at tssi.com
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:03:07 
To: <husker at tssi.com>
Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)

Alright.  If you say so.

I'm not sure what else this means, other than the "we won despite our bad
defense":

> The defense certainly was a problem last Saturday, and against 
> Missouri (or did you miss the last 3 quarters?) and against OSU.
> Thanks goodness we won all those games.

The defense was a problem against ISU, Missouri and OSU, thank goodness we
won (shortened).  

If it means something else, please let me know. Did you mean the defense was
a problem for the other team?  I guess I just don't know any other way to
interpret those two statements.  I know it's sometimes hard to get meanings
behind text based communication, so I'm asking you what else that means.

Thanks in advance for clearing it up,
Skylar

-----Original Message-----
From: David Strong [mailto:gbrlist at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:15 PM
To: husker at tssi.com; Skylar Dodds
Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)


Skylar, man, you can't help yourself can you?  Now I "claim the defense is
playing so bad it's nearly costing us games."  You have got to stop putting
words in other people's mouth.  What I say is exactly what I said, I don't
claim, imply, infer, hint, or anything else.  Ever.  Stop it.

No Skylar, you didn't respond with facts.  "Oh LOL, I'm cracking up, that is
spoiled, etc."  So saying the defense needed to play better was really that
hilarious to you and you weren't being sarcastic?  That is childish.

Dave

--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Skylar Dodds <sklarbodds at cox.net> wrote:

> From: Skylar Dodds <sklarbodds at cox.net>
> Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)
> To: "'David Strong'" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>, husker at tssi.com
> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 6:03 PM
> I apologize, next time I laugh I'll
> keep it to myself.
> 
> We have a top 25 defense and you claim the defense is
> playing so bad it's
> nearly costing us games.
> 
> You get the clinic the defense put on Mizzou right? 
> By far the best effort
> this defense has put out this year.  
> 
> For the record, I don't have a problem with sarcasm. 
> I responded with facts
> and you responded with sarcasm, which I thought was
> childish.
> 
> You have yet to bring up any facts as to why the defense is
> detrimental to
> our team right now.
> 
> --
> Skylar
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Strong [mailto:gbrlist at yahoo.com]
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 4:57 PM
> To: husker at tssi.com;
> Skylar Dodds
> Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats
> (UNCLASSIFIED)
> 
> There you go again with your "implies".  Your
> responses were far from
> polite...talking about "spoiled" and how you were LOL and
> cracking up...and
> now you have a problem with sarcasm.  Check your own
> bad manners before you
> attack others.
> 
> The defense certainly was a problem last Saturday, and
> against Missouri (or
> did you miss the last 3 quarters?) and against OSU. 
> Thanks goodness we won
> all those games.
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> > You said that in response to a poster
> > saying NU would beat KU soundly, that
> > the defense would have to play a lot better than it
> did
> > last Saturday, which
> > implies the defense was the problem last Saturday.
> That is
> > what prompted me
> > to retort as to why the defense WAS NOT the problem
> last
> > Saturday (or really
> > at all this year, save the OSU game when we played one
> of
> > the best offenses
> > in the country).
> > 
> > So far, despite my responding with facts, you
> responded
> > with sarcasm.  
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3239 - Release
> Date: 11/10/10
> 01:34:00
> 
> 


      
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3239 - Release Date: 11/11/10
01:34:00


_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker