[Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)

Wed Nov 10 13:02:03 CST 2010

Fellow Husker Fan(atic)s,

	It's nice to see some of this discourse beginning to fall to
bulletin board/blog garbage.  Someone is now "Laughing Boy" and the rest of
the crew are "stooges."  BTW...I didn't see any name calling from Skylar's
post.  Additionally, I'm not picking sides.  If anything, it's good
conversation provided the emotion and name-calling stays out of it.

	Although I mostly lurk, we need to keep this civil and keep the
name-calling off the list.  That's just my opinion.  Thanks.

Jeff
a.k.a. Huskers1

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
David Strong
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:50 AM
To: husker at tssi.com; Skylar Dodds
Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)

Well Laughing Boy, I'll tell you what I find funny.  All this venom and
attack from you and your stooges over an innocuous comment like "the defense
needs to play better."  Now it's an "axe to grind".  Putting together these
long justification posts showing how our defense it really awesome.  But it
was not work in vain.  You have convinced me.

I now publicly state for the record:  I was wrong...Our defense does not
need to play better.

Dave

--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Skylar Dodds <sklarbodds at cox.net> wrote:

> From: Skylar Dodds <sklarbodds at cox.net>
> Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)
> To: husker at tssi.com
> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 10:39 AM
> Well, I keep getting new things to
> laugh at!  
> 
> Our defense is in the top 25 in SCORING DEFENSE (if you're
> wondering, this
> is the only stat that really matters on defense).  We
> play a style of
> defense that is designed to give up yardage ON THE GROUND,
> but rarely give
> up big plays and force offenses to go 10+ plays to score
> (save for a short
> field). 
> 
> ISU scored on short fields all day.  Here's their
> scoring drive chart:
> 
> How they got it    Start   
>     Plays   
>     Yards   
>     Result
> Punt into wind    N47   
>     7       
> 47        TD
> Fumble (Helu)    N41   
>     4       
> 2        FG
> Kickoff       
> I25       
> 13        75   
>     TD
> Fumble (NP)       
> N13        3   
>     13       
> TD
> OT Start       
> N25        3   
>     25       
> TD
> 
> So, in short.  We gave up 1 drive that started in ISU
> territory.  ONE DRIVE.
> And, we made them go 13 plays to do it.  The fighting
> Pelini's have said
> that their defense is designed to say, if you can execute
> perfectly for
> 10-15 plays in a row, we'll give up the small chunks of
> yardage.
> 
> Was it the best performance by the defense? No.  Was
> it good enough to win?
> 100% yes.  The offense continually gave ISU short
> fields all day and to hold
> them to 24 points in regulation is not bad at all.
> 
> Not to mention, 3 out of the 4 TDs came against our 2nd
> string (true frosh)
> and 3rd string corners and our 1st stringer will be back
> this week.  But,
> why look at the facts?  Instead let's just continue to
> not realize what's
> going on and play the role of arm-chair coach.  Let's
> ignore the fact that
> our coaches took a 'worst defense in college football' and
> 2-3 years later
> only allowed more than 21 points twice over a stretch of
> about 25 games.
> Let's bury our head in the sand and complain about a
> defense that's in the
> top 25 in scoring defense because they're not better than
> last year's #1
> scoring defense that lost 4 of the biggest 'cogs' (Suh,
> Dillard, O'Hanlan
> <-- biggest loss IMO, Asante).
> 
> Keep grinding your ax against Pellini and his defenses and
> I'll keep
> laughing.
> 
> --
> Skylar
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Strong [mailto:gbrlist at yahoo.com]
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:08 PM
> To: husker at tssi.com;
> Skylar Dodds
> Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats
> (UNCLASSIFIED)
> 
> 
> If you are done cracking up yet, I think you better check
> on current events.
> We just came very close to losing a game to 4-4 Iowa
> State.  In fact, we
> would have lost if the holder had put any mustard
> whatsoever on that pass.
> And all the stats you want to quote don't change the fact
> they hung 30+ on
> our defense.  When you are down to your 3rd string QB,
> the other members of
> the team have to assume the responsibility to play just a
> little bit better.
> Our defense did not.  Lucky to get away with it,
> probably can again this
> Saturday too.  
> 
> Dave
> 
> > Wow, how quickly do we get spoiled
> > with a Pellini defense.  We gave up 24
> > points in regulation last week, all from short
> > fields.  ISU ran about 20
> > more plays than we did.  We gave up 100 yards to
> their
> > RB, but it took him
> > 33 carries.  Yet "the defense better shape up".
> > 
> > In the Cosgrove era, this would have been an inspired
> > effort.  LOL, just
> > cracks me up.
> > 
> > --
> > Skylar
> > 
> 
> > 
> > The entire defense is going to have to gut up and play
> a
> > whole helluva lot
> > better than it did last Saturday.
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3239 - Release
> Date: 11/09/10
> 13:34:00
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker