[Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)

[fourbox at nctc.net]

The current events show me that the Huskers have been using a 3-man D-line. For that to be effective the receivers need covered like a blanket. They were against MU even w/o Dennard. Not so at ISU. I'm not worried. We are making improvements. Sorry it disappoints the B  C fans!
Bob in the sandhills 
Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel

-----Original Message-----
From: David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
Sender: husker-bounces at tssi.com
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:08:10 
To: <husker at tssi.com>; Skylar Dodds<sklarbodds at cox.net>
Subject: RE: [Husker] Nebraska vs Kansas stats (UNCLASSIFIED)


If you are done cracking up yet, I think you better check on current events.  We just came very close to losing a game to 4-4 Iowa State.  In fact, we would have lost if the holder had put any mustard whatsoever on that pass.  And all the stats you want to quote don't change the fact they hung 30+ on our defense.  When you are down to your 3rd string QB, the other members of the team have to assume the responsibility to play just a little bit better.  Our defense did not.  Lucky to get away with it, probably can again this Saturday too.  

Dave

> Wow, how quickly do we get spoiled
> with a Pellini defense.  We gave up 24
> points in regulation last week, all from short
> fields.  ISU ran about 20
> more plays than we did.  We gave up 100 yards to their
> RB, but it took him
> 33 carries.  Yet "the defense better shape up".
> 
> In the Cosgrove era, this would have been an inspired
> effort.  LOL, just
> cracks me up.
> 
> --
> Skylar
> 

> 
> The entire defense is going to have to gut up and play a
> whole helluva lot
> better than it did last Saturday.
> 
> Dave
> 



      

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker