[Husker] OT win

[DAVID L MCGEE]

Nebraska drops to #8 in the BCS poll.
Jean

--- On Sun, 11/7/10, Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net> wrote:


From: Tony lambert <slimmer37 at hamilton.net>
Subject: Re: [Husker] OT win
To: "SteveG" <stevegomez6571 at gmail.com>, "Huskerz" <husker at tssi.com>
Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 8:46 PM


I was in the shadow of the scoreboard for most of the game. but did have 
padding for my butt. In the the tailgate gate I was at a few ISU fans got 
after us. Beer toting ISU students I would guess lots of F*&$ You, you 
losers. But a good time.

Tony Lambert
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "SteveG" <stevegomez6571 at gmail.com>
To: "Huskerz" <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 7:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Husker] OT win


> >From Section H, Row 23:
>
> It was indeed l-o-u-d --- not Mizzou L-O-U-D --- but still pretty darn
> l-o-u-d for an away game.  I didn't expect to see what I saw at Ames...as
> Dennis Green would say... "We aren't who we thought we were."
>
> Anyway, here are my quick observations:
>
> (1) Pre-game tailgating was festive!  A lot of fan intermingling with
> absolutely no ill-will witnessed before, during or after the game.
>
> (2) The State Fair Corn Dogs hit the spot.
>
> (3) Noticed that # 21 was demoted for the Coin Toss team.
>
> (4) Rex-Magic deserves the game ball for his play as de-facto, 4th string,
> QB.
>
> (5) #24 is a %&$*! Senior.  I am not going to badger him [or his family].
> However, in a split-second decision, he decides to take the ball ~5 yds
> deep, out of the end zone.  Then fails to secure the ball (fumbles) and
> allowed the Cyclones to gain all of the momentum.  Is it fair to expect 
> more
> out of a senior?   The Huskers never did regain control of the game.  We
> left the stadium only after Hagg snatched victory from the jaws of defeat.
> Whew!
>
> (6) The team chemistry just wasn't there in Ames.  I really hope all of 
> the
> injured players with nicks and bruises, strains and sprains all get better
> before the Texas A&M game.
>
> (7)  We sat next to fellow lister, Brad and his bride.  Had a great time
> despite the usual colder-than-it-looks bleachers.
>
> Go Big Red!
>
> Steve G
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf 
> Of
> Tony lambert
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 4:17 PM
> To: Rod Wellman; "Husker List"
> Subject: Re: [Husker] OT win
>
> Hey I was in the south end zone row 10 and am just now getting my voice
> back, So I was making noise as much as I could.
>
> Tony Lambert
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rod Wellman" <gobigred66 at mac.com>
> To: ""Husker List"" <husker at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 4:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Husker] OT win
>
>
>>I was at the game, and was happy that all the OT action happened in our 
>>end
>
>>zone, right in front of us.  The visitor's section was on the south  side
>>of the stadium on the west side, and there was a good concentration of
>>Husker fans in general on the south side.  It got fairly loud when ISU was
>>on offense in OT, so maybe that played into their choice, too.
>>
>> Rod W.
>> Sioux City, Ia.
>>
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Steve Reichenbach wrote:
>>
>>> ISU won the flip and chose defense because it is a HUGE advantage to
>>> have the other team go first.  If they don't score, all you need is
>>> a FG.  If they score a TD, you know you must score a TD.  That is a
>>> HUGE advantage.
>>>
>>> NU didn't choose the end they meant to choose, which worked out fine.
>>> In fact, I sort of thought that NU might be better choosing as they
>>> did because NU was running the ball better and ISU had relied more on
>>> the pass.  So, it might make sense to choose to go into the wind.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yes, I know that we intentionally chose which end of the field. My
>>>> question is why didn't they? They won the toss and could have chosen
>>>> which end of the field to use and then we would have chosen offense of
>>>> defense. They either didn't think about it or they just decided that
>>>> the choice of defense, the standard first choice, was the right way to
>>>> go.
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker 

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker