[Husker] OT win

Jay Saunders jaydsaunders at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 7 10:27:13 CST 2010


I haven't heard, but I don't think it was a mistake on Nebraska's part to play 
against the wind; meaning I think it was planned. It took away Iowa State's dual 
threat (or it should have) and Alex is a much better kicker - on either side of 
the field.

Jay Saunders
Milwaukee, WI



----- Original Message ----
From: David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
To: huskers <husker at tssi.com>; Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com>
Sent: Sun, November 7, 2010 6:28:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] OT win


I was thinking the same thing before OT started.  I hoped we would lose the 
toss.  But then they put up a graphic that said the winner of the toss could 
choose either "offense, defense, or end of field."  I didn't know that.  They 
chose the standard answer "defense".  But since IS clearly was a better team 
with the wind, wouldn't it have been better to have chosen "end of field" this 
time?

Dave

--- On Sun, 11/7/10, Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com> wrote:

> From: Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com>
> Subject: [Husker] OT  win
> To: "huskers" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 3:40 AM
> Strange as it sounds, the game may
> have been won at the coin toss before OT.  When NU lost
> the toss there, either from confusion or by accident, the NU
> captain made the choice to play the first OT session going
> into the wind.
> 
> After watching the fake multiple times, I am convinced that
> the ISU player was open enough to make that play if the toss
> had been with the wind.
> 
> I guess it was NU's turn to have something good happen.
> 
>  .
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 


      

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker



      



More information about the husker mailing list