[Husker] OT win
Jay Saunders
jaydsaunders at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 7 10:27:13 CST 2010
I haven't heard, but I don't think it was a mistake on Nebraska's part to play
against the wind; meaning I think it was planned. It took away Iowa State's dual
threat (or it should have) and Alex is a much better kicker - on either side of
the field.
Jay Saunders
Milwaukee, WI
----- Original Message ----
From: David Strong <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
To: huskers <husker at tssi.com>; Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com>
Sent: Sun, November 7, 2010 6:28:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] OT win
I was thinking the same thing before OT started. I hoped we would lose the
toss. But then they put up a graphic that said the winner of the toss could
choose either "offense, defense, or end of field." I didn't know that. They
chose the standard answer "defense". But since IS clearly was a better team
with the wind, wouldn't it have been better to have chosen "end of field" this
time?
Dave
--- On Sun, 11/7/10, Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com> wrote:
> From: Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com>
> Subject: [Husker] OT win
> To: "huskers" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 3:40 AM
> Strange as it sounds, the game may
> have been won at the coin toss before OT. When NU lost
> the toss there, either from confusion or by accident, the NU
> captain made the choice to play the first OT session going
> into the wind.
>
> After watching the fake multiple times, I am convinced that
> the ISU player was open enough to make that play if the toss
> had been with the wind.
>
> I guess it was NU's turn to have something good happen.
>
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list