Re: [Husker] OT win

[Skylar Dodds]

I'm actually quite certain that was done intentionally.  With our ground game going pretty well, and their ineptitude going against the wind and their questionable kicker, it seemed like the obvious voice to me.

--
Skylar

----- Reply message -----
From: "David Strong" <gbrlist at yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, Nov 7, 2010 5:28 am
Subject: [Husker] OT  win
To: "huskers" <husker at tssi.com>, "Ken Oliver" <ksterling at mindspring.com>


I was thinking the same thing before OT started.  I hoped we would lose the toss.  But then they put up a graphic that said the winner of the toss could choose either "offense, defense, or end of field."  I didn't know that.  They chose the standard answer "defense".  But since IS clearly was a better team with the wind, wouldn't it have been better to have chosen "end of field" this time?

Dave

--- On Sun, 11/7/10, Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com> wrote:

> From: Ken Oliver <ksterling at mindspring.com>
> Subject: [Husker] OT  win
> To: "huskers" <husker at tssi.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 7, 2010, 3:40 AM
> Strange as it sounds, the game may
> have been won at the coin toss before OT.  When NU lost
> the toss there, either from confusion or by accident, the NU
> captain made the choice to play the first OT session going
> into the wind.
> 
> After watching the fake multiple times, I am convinced that
> the ISU player was open enough to make that play if the toss
> had been with the wind.
> 
> I guess it was NU's turn to have something good happen.
> 
>  .
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 


      

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker