[Husker] Interesting articles of the day.

[Rod Wellman]

I look for Texas to "play" in the B12 long enough to establish their own TV network.  At that point, when the Pac 10 and Big 10 won't allow them to join their conferences without disbanding their TV network, they'll go independent so they can keep ALL of the money they generate.

Rod W.
Sioux City, IA


On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:

> I wonder if Beebe has factored that there is no way the Big 12 fills 8 post
> season bowls with these 10 teams. I would expect they would be lucky to fill
> 6. How will that effect the money.
> 
> I just don't see this arrangement working long. I see Texas looking for
> greener pastures as soon as their TV network is established. That give them
> a little more bargaining leverage if it is already going.
> 
> Scott
> 
> PS. Looks like I was wrong about the Utes. They will be a good addition to
> the Pac 10, probably stronger than CU. Won't that upset the faithful in
> Boulder.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Lynette Tillner <ltillner at yahoo.com>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Big 12: No Resistance from the North (talks about how the remaining Big XII
>> North teams have faired against Texas and OU):
>> 
>> http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2010/06/16/big-12-no-resistance-from-the-north/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
>> 
>> Talks about who's the bigger winner NU or Big Ten:
>> 
>> http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/13244/bigger-expansion-winner-nebraska-or-bt
>> 
>> Lynette (Tillner) Peavey
>> ltillner at yahoo.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> husker site list
>> husker at tssi.com
>> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker